Med-Terra Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311232074
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Dayton, OH, USA
Phone
9374999942
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Real Estate Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,322,636
Expenses
$2,004,622
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RONAL MANIS MD (TRUSTEE / MED STAFF PRESIDENT)
  • REBECCA A RICE (UPPER VALLEY PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • THOMAS PARKER (FORMER UVMC CEO)
  • MICHAEL J MAIBERGER (FORMER CEO)
  • DAVID MECKSTROTH (FORMER UVMC CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL J MAIBERGER (FORMER CEO): $611,118 total reported compensation
  • THOMAS PARKER (FORMER UVMC CEO): $483,242 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTOPHER A GROVE (MED STAFF 1ST VP): $359,297 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Med-terra, inc. Is a not-for-profit corporation formed for the purpose of holding real estate. It is a member corporation of uvmc, an Ohio 501(c)(3) corporation, which funds significant capital expenditures. All material transactions conducted by the corporation are directly related to the performance of its tax-exempt activities. Med-terra owns facilities in miami and darke counties and rents medical office space to physicians and to related organizations. This enables upper valley medical center, a related, tax-exempt hospital, to offer easy access to quality care by providing outpatient services throughout the community. Satellite locations provide laboratory, radiology, surgical, sports medicine, occupational health, and rehabilitative services. In addition, three other related organizations rent office space to provide physician care in the areas of family practice, internal medicine, pediatrics, surgical, obstetrical/gynecological, and orthopedics.

What it reported doing in 2014

See attachment 1

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 73.3%; rating input score 73; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.7%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -20.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 11 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $611K · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.