Mayo Clinic Health System - Red Wing

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411713783
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2015
Location
Red Wing, MN, USA
Phone
5075381297
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$110,498,805
Expenses
$112,259,813
Assets
$67,629,377
Liabilities
$68,894,676

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AGERTER MD DAVID C (DIRECTOR/CEO)
  • WITT MD THOMAS J (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • KETCHAM MD JEFFREY M (DIRECTOR): $759,393 total reported compensation
  • HUGHES MD EVERETT M (PHYSICIAN): $690,756 total reported compensation
  • SMITH MD HUGH S (PHYSICIAN): $684,451 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through integrated clinical practice, education, and research.

What it reported doing in 2015

Community programs (see schedule o): as part of its activities, mchs-red wing provides various support groups and programs to the community at no charge. These groups and classes include diabetic educational programs, living well with chronic conditions classes coordinated with ship programs, and the caregiver family and patient support program assisted 723 persons. Cardiac support wellness for life class was offered to 32 patients. Prenatal classes for expectant parents were attended by 3,113 persons and include 1,466 staff hours. Lactation staff coordinated events in local libraries and at the goodhue county fair to provide nutrition information to reduce obesity in youth. Mchs-red wing also conducted flu shot clinics and during the month of october offered discounted mammograms to women who qualified. Mchs-red wing staff participated in the book read "good for you and me" promoting the 5-2-1-0 nutrition and activity program with primary care and pediatric staff at local day cares. Nutrition services staff prepared 2,900 meals for the summer nutrition program for 60 children with economic and nutritional needs. Mchs-red wing offered sports physicals at a reduced rate for 35 high school athletes along with concussion management, and staff coverage at home high school football games to respond to emergencies. Mchs-red wing also offers a program that allows 11 high school students to come on-site and learn about health care careers and participate in job shadowing experiences for 52 hours. Mchs-red wing provides education opportunities through rpap, student internships and nursing student training, 300 students calculated 10% of the time in the building for 1641 staff hours. Leadership and donations strengthened partnerships with local charities or community organizations promoting health in their communities. Funds provided to community organizations include a $2,000 "live healthy red wing" sponsorship. This is a community partnership, making policy and environmental changes to improve nutrition and activity for our community. Mchs-red wing also provided $6,000 to every hand joined which is a community partnership committed to improving lives cradle to career. Mchs-red wing supports the care clinic, a free clinic in the county, by providing space valued at $25,900, laboratory and radiology services benefitting 420 people valued at $12,443, and malpractice insurance for employees who donated 1,250 hours with 1,158 patient encounters for 693 unique patients. Mchs-red wing provides space valued at $29,900 to additional nonprofit organizations in the professional and community center. Mchs-red wing employees meet and remain in close contact with administration at the red wing school system. As a result of this close interaction, mchs-red wing provided several services to students in 2015 including maturation classes in the elementary schools and middle school, safe routes to schools development and several staff presentations about their jobs during high school career classes at school. The rehabilitation department works with the local athletic departments in high school and youth sports providing community athletic services to 500 youth. Mchs-red wing employees also participate in "every hand joined" which is a collective impact initiative with the school to lift the potential of all red wing children.mchs-red wing also receives donated services from volunteers consisting of individuals that help organize and manage activities for the benefit of mchs-red wing's patients, patient's families, visitors and staff. The volunteers operate a gift shop, assist patients and greet visitors. During 2015, 189 auxiliary volunteers donated approximately 12,394 hours of service. Based on 2015 independent sector statistics, the approximate value of these services were $292,003. Mayo clinic health system-red wing (mchs-red wing) employees throughout the organization assess the needs of red wing and the surrounding communities through personal in

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 68
  • Accountability: 59
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91.2%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 69.7%; rating input score 70; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 45.5%; rating input score 45; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.02; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91.2% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $100.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $759K · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7.5M reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 53 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.