Mayo Clinic Health System-cannon Falls

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204156428
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2015
Location
Cannon Falls, MN, USA
Phone
5075381297
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,473,969
Expenses
$28,556,762
Assets
$38,679,700
Liabilities
$7,398,447

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AGERTER MD DAVID C (DIRECTOR/REGION CEO)
  • WITT MD THOMAS J (DIRECTOR/CHAIR/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • NORDAHL MD THOMAS W (PHYSICIAN): $644,553 total reported compensation
  • AGERTER MD DAVID C (DIRECTOR/REGION CEO): $623,798 total reported compensation
  • TURNA MD TARLOCHAN S (PHYSICIAN): $610,173 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through integrated clinical practice, education, and research.

What it reported doing in 2015

Community outreach - see schedule omayo clinic health system-cannon falls (mchs-cf) participates in community and wellness events where free or nominal fee screening tests are offered as well as free patient education materials. These events include first thursdays, shepherds center, and twin rivers. Flu shots were given to volunteer firefighters and ambulance responders. Emergency preparedness training was provided to 50 members of the army reserve during two training sessions at the medical center. Free community screening for diabetes is done through a partnership with the local lions club at the medical center on an annual basis. Mchs-cf meals on wheels program provides free home delivered noon meals to homebound seniors over 60 with a moderate to high nutritional risk. This year the program expanded to a senior housing site and doubled the participation. This program is available on an annual basis, monday through friday to approximately 30 to 35 daily participants with more than 225 different community members receiving meals during 2015. Mchs-cannon falls staff participated in the book read "good for you and me" promoting the 5-2-1-0 nutrition and activity program with primary care and pediatric staff. Mchs-cannon falls offered sports physicals at a reduced rate for 15 students who are participating in sports through the local schools. Mchs-cf auxiliary provides approximately 45 volunteers to greet and direct patients during high-volume surgery weekdays and offers clerical support to staff. The auxiliary volunteers provided approximately 914 hours of volunteer services. Based on the 2015 independent sector statistics, the approximate value of these services is $21,530.mayo clinic health system-cannon falls (mchs-cannon falls) determines patient needs through a variety of means: direct feedback from patients to employees at point of care and at other opportunities, through community representation on the medical center community advisory council and through continual, random, confidential patient satisfaction surveys which are part of the decision-making processes for improving patient care and customer service. Mchs-cannon falls employees are also strongly connected with local civic groups. Many employees are active members of various cannon falls organizations, while others give healthcare presentations to these groups. This participation not only promotes involvement in the community, but also gives community members a chance to ask questions, share comments, concerns or other suggestions they may have regarding the medical center. Mchs-cannon falls employees promote the active referral of patients to local resources such as access to high quality nutritious foods, physical activity and tobacco use cessation programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 58
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.9%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $699.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 44.4%; rating input score 44; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.7%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.9% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $24.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $645K · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $3.6M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 52 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 44/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.