Mayo Clinic Health System-mankato Health Care Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411663357
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Mankato, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5075381297
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $708,390
- Expenses
- $568,474
- Assets
- $3,181,739
- Liabilities
- $43,393
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KUTCHER MD GREGORY R (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KUTCHER MD GREGORY R (CEO): $564,844 total reported compensation
- GRACE RICHARD W (CAO): $438,211 total reported compensation
- LANGBEHN DO JENNIFER M (DIRECTOR): $390,925 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Secures and distributes charitable gifts to enhance the compassionate and healing mission of mayo clinic health system - mankato.
What it reported doing in 2014
See schedule o.mayo clinic health system is a family of clinics, hospitals and health care facilities serving communities in Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin and Georgia. As part of mayo clinic, the health system offers care designed for the whole body close to the patient's home, when they need it. A multidisciplinary team of experts has ready access to knowledge, resources, and expertise of mayo clinic and collaborates on providing exactly the care the patient needs. Mayo clinic health system sites employ approximately 1,000 physicians and 15,000 allied health staff. In addition, mayo clinic physicians from multiple specialties regularly see patients at health system facilities. Besides having health care facilities in nearly 70 communities, mayo clinic health system includes 19 owned hospitals, five owned nursing homes, physician service agreements with one additional hospital, and contract management agreements with two additional hospitals and one nursing home. Since its inception in 1992, mayo clinic health system has grown into one of the most successful regional health care systems in the united states. More than 600,000 unique patients account for more than 2.6 million visits annually in mayo clinic health system. It is also a national leader in quality and safety efforts. Mayo clinic health system - mankato health care foundation (the foundation) is incorporated to enhance the health care programs and services of mayo clinic health system - mankato (mchs-mankato).gifts provided in 2014 include the following: support mchs-mankato's palliative care and hospice services in mankato, st. Peter, le sueur, springfield, st. James, waseca, madelia and surrounding communities.grants to support programs within mchs-mankato, including nursing education, lab education, medically indigent support and other programs.the foundation received donated management and general services of approximately $674,777 from mchs-mankato for the year ended december 31, 2014. This amount is not reflected in the accompanying statements of activities as contribution income and management and general, special events, and fundraising expenses. The donated services from mchs-mankato include personnel and other expenses necessary in the implementation and operation of fundraising and special events.in addition, the foundation received donated use of facilities from mchs-mankato. The value of the use of facilities was not material and has not been recorded in the accompanying financial statements.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.5%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 90.1%; rating input score 90; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.8%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.6; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 30.4%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $568K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $565K · 16 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 18 of 20 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 59 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.