Mayo Clinic Health System
Legal name: Mayo Clinic Health System-lake City
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411906820
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2015
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015
- Location
- Lake City, MN, USA
- Phone
- 507-594-2929
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,659,598
- Expenses
- $42,549,162
- Assets
- $39,703,752
- Liabilities
- $8,938,718
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AGERTER MD DAVID C (DIRECTOR/REGION CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- AGERTER MD DAVID C (DIRECTOR/REGION CEO): $623,798 total reported compensation
- SPANO MD DENNIS C (DIRECTOR/VICE CHAIR): $575,022 total reported compensation
- WITT MD THOMAS J (DIRECTOR/CHAIR): $543,902 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through integrated clinical practice, education and research.
What it reported doing in 2015
Patient care (see schedule o): patient care: mayo clinic health system - lake city (mchs-lake city) is a member of the mayo clinic health system. Mayo clinic health system is a family of clinics, hospitals and health care facilities serving communities in Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin and Georgia. As part of mayo clinic, the health system offers care designed for the whole body close to the patient's home, when they need it. A multidisciplinary team of experts has ready access to knowledge, resources, and expertise of mayo clinic and collaborates on providing exactly the care the patient needs. Mayo clinic health system sites employ approximately 1,000 physicians and 15,000 allied health staff. In addition, mayo clinic physicians from multiple specialties regularly see patients at health system facilities. Besides having health care facilities in more than 60 communities, mayo clinic health system includes 19 owned hospitals, two owned nursing homes, physician service agreements with one additional hospital, and contract management agreements with two additional hospitals and one nursing home.since its inception in 1992, mayo clinic health system has grown into one of the most successful regional health care systems in the united states. More than 600,000 unique patients account for more than 2.6 million visits annually in mayo clinic health system. It is also a national leader in quality and safety efforts.mchs-lake city owns and operates an 18 bed critical access hospital serving lake city, Minnesota and surrounding communities. During the year ended december 31, 2015, lake city had 198 medical/surgical admissions, 16 obstetric admissions, and 171 swing bed admissions with an average daily census of 7.9. In addition, there were 2,522 emergency room visits, 204 same day surgeries and ancillary services including laboratory, cardiac rehabilitation, physical, occupational and speech therapy, and radiology services. Radiology services included mammography, ct, mri and ultrasound.mchs-lake city also owns and operates four clinics located in alma, Wisconsin and in lake city, plainview and wabasha, Minnesota. These clinics are staffed by eleven family medicine physicians, a general surgeon, two physician assistants, and five nurse practitioners, including a certified nurse-midwife. On an annual basis, there are approximately 52,379 patient visits among the four clinic locations.mchs-lake city continues to provide a ventilator program to ensure continuum of care and the most appropriate placement and level of care for ventilated and other patients requiring a high level of respiratory care. Mchs-lake city has committed eleven beds in the facility for caring for this kind of patient population, along with providing classroom and skills training for nursing staff and providers.mchs-lake city provides care to patients who meet certain criteria under its financial assistance policy without charge or at amounts less than its established rates. Services are also provided to medicaid and medicare patients at substantial discounts from standard fees. In 2015, mchs-lake city provided approximately $761,500 in financial assistance to patients. The total cost of uncompensated care provided to low income patients through medicaid and minnesotacare (a state program for providing medical care to the low income population) was approximately $1,952,200 which includes the medicaid surcharge of $431,177 and mncare tax of $326,313.the unreimbursed cost of services to medicare patients was approximately $291,000. Lake city has approximately 106 volunteers including individuals and service groups who provided approximately 3,101 hours of volunteer services during 2015. They staff the information desk directing patients and visitors to their destination and perform clerical duties for various departments in the medical center. Based on the 2015 independent sector statistics, the approximate value of these services is $73,060.mayo clinic health system-lake c
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 58
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.3%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 44.4%; rating input score 44; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 86.3% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $36.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $624K · 20 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.9M reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 52 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 44/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.