Mayo Clinic Health System-austin
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 410695606
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012
- Location
- Austin, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5075381297
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $120,454,016
- Expenses
- $112,415,572
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
32 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through integrated clinical practice, education, and research.
What it reported doing in 2012
Patient care - see schedule omayo clinic health system is a family of clinics, hospitals and health care facilities serving communities in Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin. As part of mayo clinic, mayo clinic health system offers outstanding care close to home. Physicians and staff in mayo clinic health system have ready access to the knowledge, resources, and expertise of mayo clinic, yet can meet patients' health care needs locally. Mayo clinic health system is part of the community, focused on improving the health of the communities in which we live and work. Mayo clinic health system teams with mayo clinic to deliver unparalleled health care to communities through an integrated network of clinics and hospitals.in 2012, mayo clinic health system sites employed approximately 1,000 physicians and 14,000 allied health staff. In addition, mayo clinic physicians from multiple specialties regularly see patients at the mayo clinic health system facilities. Besides having health care facilities in 72 communities, the system includes 18 owned hospitals, six owned nursing homes, physician service agreements with two additional hospitals, and contract management agreements with an additional hospital and nursing home. Since its inception in 1992, mayo clinic health system has grown from a new idea to one of the most successful regional health care systems in america. Mayo clinic health system completes more than two-million patient visits annually. It also serves as a national leader in quality and safety efforts being recognized six times by the american medical group association's acclaim award program (2005 acclaim award recipient and five-time acclaim award honoree). The acclaim awards honor physician-led organizations delivering care aligned with the ideal delivery model where patients experience safe, reliable, responsive, readily available and integrated care. In addition, the Minnesota council for quality has recognized mayo clinic health system three times for its performance excellence efforts. Individual mayo clinic health system locations have also been honored for their commitment to quality, safety, service, performance and their communities.people in Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin can have peace of mind knowing that mayo clinic health system and mayo clinic partner to ensure healthier lives in the region.as part of the mayo clinic health system, mayo clinic health system-austin (mchs-austin) operates a hospital and clinic in austin, Minnesota - along with regional clinics in the Minnesota communities of adams, blooming prairie, grand meadow and leroy. Mchs-austin is presently licensed for 82 beds with an average daily census of 36. Mchs-austin employs approximately 1,000 individuals. This employee total includes, among other staff, 69 physicians, 5 physician assistants, 2 audiologists, 20 nurse practitioners and 2 optometrists. Mchs-austin primarly serves mower county, which has a population of 39,372, and the surrounding rural communities.in 2012, there were 3,337 patients admitted, 368,937 ancillary outpatient procedures and 146,183 clinic visits. In addition to providing primary care (including family practice, internal medicine, ob/gyn, pediatrics, and general surgery), mchs-austin provides specialty care services in allergy, audiology, behavioral healthcare, cardiology, dermatology, endocrinology, ent, gastroenterology, sleep, pain, home health/hospice, neurology, oncology, ophthalmology, orthopedic surgery, podiatry, psychiatry, rheumatology, and urology. Mchs-austin also provides programs in alternative medicine, including a pain clinic, sports medicine, and massage therapy.mchs-austin provides care to patients who meet certain criteria under its charity care policy without charge or at amounts less than its established rates. Services are provided to both medicare and medicaid patients at substantial discounts from standard fees. In addition, services are also provided to patients under other means-tested government
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 57
- Accountability: 62
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 44.2%; rating input score 44; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.7%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -73.1% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 5 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $102.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $833K · 32 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 70 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 44/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.