Marycrest Heights
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270291722
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Farmington Hills, MI, USA
- Phone
- 7345428300
- Rating
- 32
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $95,473
- Expenses
- $56,053
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KENNETH ROBBINS (TRUSTEE; CEO)
- GRACE MCCAULEY (TRUSTEE THROUGH 07/15; CEO, THHS)
People named in this filing
- KENNETH ROBBINS (TRUSTEE; CEO)
- MARIA SZYMANSKI (TRUSTEE;CHAIR;FORMER TRINITY SVP)
- JOANNE HANDY (TRUSTEE; VICE CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide independent living in community for seniors.
What it reported doing in 2015
Marycrest heights is located in livonia, mi and offers 60 independent living apartments for seniors or disabled adults who are generally healthy and able to care for themselves, can communicate with doctors and caregivers by themselves, prefer to live among their peers and no longer choose to maintain a house. Residents can enjoy life-enriching community activities, going on group outings or just relaxing without maintenance worries.for additional information on facilities and services, please visit our website at: www.trinityseniorsanctuary.org/marycrest-heights-livonia
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.3%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 313 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.