Marco Island Hospital Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 592315435
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Marco Island, FL, USA
- Phone
- 2396246338
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,692,455
- Expenses
- $3,639,082
- Assets
- $15,971,309
- Liabilities
- $1,331,297
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
37 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAUL HILTZ (PRESIDENT/CEO/TRUSTEE)
- JIM MAHON (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- PAUL HILTZ (PRESIDENT/CEO/TRUSTEE): $2,398,419 total reported compensation
- KRISTIN MASCOTTI MD TRM 224 (FORMER CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $1,060,342 total reported compensation
- JONATHAN KLING (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER SYSTEM): $950,393 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Helping everyone live a longer, happier, and healthier life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Marco island hospital, inc., operates an 11 1/2-hour/7-days a week urgent care facility and services patients without regard to their ability to pay. During fye 09/30/2025, 6,416 patients were treated. Of these patients, 5.78% were classified as medicaid, charity, or bad debts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 78.7%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.4%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.39; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61% of revenue deployed · 78.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.4M · 37 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $4.8M reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.