Lupus and Allied Diseases Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
161083229
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Verona, NY, USA
Phone
3158294272
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$987,432
Expenses
$740,149
Assets
$2,825,249
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kathleen A Arntsen (President and CEO)
  • Sandra M Frear (1st Vice President)
  • Anne M Zablotowicz (2nd Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Kathleen A Arntsen (President and CEO)
  • Lori A Vogel (Treasurer)
  • David L Arntsen (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Lupus and Allied Diseases Association's mission is to advocate for those affected by lupus and allied diseases through public awareness, education and research program initiatives to improve quality of life.

What it reported doing in 2024

1. The organization supported lupus research to improve methods of diagnosis and treatment by funding a $150,000 grant to the the Lupus Research Alliance to support SLE Cognitive Impairment Differentiation and Imaging Lupus Nephritis Biopsies Prognosis Projects. 2. The organization supported pediatric lupus research to study Advancing Molecular Profiling and Understanding Adverse Events Projects in the pediatric population by funding a $89,424 grant to the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance. 3. The organization also supported $25,000 to support Does Air Pollution Influence the Baseline Characteristics of Pediatric SLE Project to improve the quality of life for the pediatric population with lupus at the Lupus Foundation of America. 4. The organization funded the Marc R. Chevrier, MD, PhD, FACR, Lupus Research Memorial Fund at the Rheumatology Research Foundation by supporting a $25,300 preceptorship grant and a separate $50,000 grant to support Innovative Lupus Research. 5. The organization supported lupus research by funding a $200,000 grant to the Masonic Medical Research Institute to provide $50,000 to support a study on Gain-of-function mutations in SHP2 enhance inflammatory macrophage activation in SLE, $50,000 for Cell Activation in Venous Thromboembolism in Female Murine SLE, $50,000 for pathophysiological role of IRF2BP2 in SLE, and $50,000 for Identification of Novel Genes in Lupus Nephritis Development.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 77% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 99.5%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1,333.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.82; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77% of revenue deployed · 99.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $737K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 46 of 47 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.