Lupus Foundation of America Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431131436
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2023491155
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,997,967
Expenses
$16,743,518
Assets
$11,374,155
Liabilities
$6,641,567

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

33 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LOUISE VETTER PRESIDENT (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • MARY T CRIMMINGS INTERIM (CEO; VP, MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS)
  • MICHAEL DONNELLY (VICE PRESIDENT, COMMUNICATIONS)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARY T CRIMMINGS INTERIM (CEO; VP, MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS): $340,899 total reported compensation
  • JEANINE SMITH (VP, NETWORK DEVELOPMENT): $260,133 total reported compensation
  • PATRICK WILDMAN (VP, ADVOCACY & GOVERNMENT): $239,515 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Lupus foundation of america, inc. (the foundation) is dedicated to improving the quality of life for all people affected by lupus through programs of research, education, support, and advocacy.

What it reported doing in 2024

Research: recent therapeutic advances have significantly improved outcomes for people with lupus, with approximately 97 percent of patients now living at least five years after diagnosis. Despite this progress, continued research is essential to enhance quality of life and deepen understanding of the disease. The lupus foundation of america anchors its research efforts in three interconnected priorities: advancing clinical care, expanding equitable access to care, and accelerating drug development. A cornerstone initiative is the addressing lupus pillars for health advancement (alpha) project, a global, multi-phase effort to identify urgent unmet needs in lupus care. In 2025, alpha expanded its focus to patient-provider communication and barriers to high-quality care. The team conducted a review of more than 2,300 articles, developed a decision-making framework, and held focus groups with individuals living with lupus to better understand treatment challenges. These efforts led to the creation of a prototype shared decision-making toolavailable in paper and mobile formatsto help patients better understand treatment options and collaborate effectively with providers.a roadmap identifying u.s. "rheumatology deserts" was developed to improve access to timely diagnosis and care. Additionally, a consensus-based manuscript outlining solutions to racial and ethnic disparities was published in arthritis care and research and featured in healio magazine.the foundation also funds fellowships and early-career development grants to ensure training support for lupus researchers. It partners with lupus canada to administer the catalyst grant and actively pursues federal, state, and industry funding to strengthen lupus research pipelines. Research investments include support for a multi-year study of mesenchymal stromal cells as a potential lupus treatment, led by the medical university of South Carolina in partnership with the national institute for allergy and infectious diseases. All participants have completed the study, and results are expected in 2026. Additionally, the lfa-funded care lupus study, part of the predict and prevent lupus program, has made significant progress in identifying first-degree relatives at risk of developing lupus.the foundation also supports the systemic lupus erythematosus collaborating clinics (slicc) in updating the fda-accepted slicc damage index, participates in lupus abc to improve clinical trial outcome measures, and partners in the treatment response measure for sle (trm-sle) project to elevate the patient voice.the ray registry continues to expand as a vital patient data platform. Since october 2024, 473 new participants enrolled, bringing total enrollment to 7,163. Recruitment efforts have increased representation among black/african american participants and other racial and ethnic groups. Most new enrollees have systemic lupus erythematosus (sle), with a median age of 45. In 2025, the ray platform was upgraded to enhance communication, expand global reach, and improve patient-reported data collection to accelerate research and clinical trial participation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.8%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 74.8%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 89.5%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 47%; rating input score 47; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.2%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.8% of revenue deployed · 74.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $12.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $341K · 33 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.9M reported
  • Consistency: 41 of 43 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.