Lobular Breast Cancer Alliance Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
862260246
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
White Horse Beach, MA, USA
Phone
6179211949
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,379,467
Expenses
$894,593
Assets
$1,106,495
Liabilities
$23,360

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURIE B HUTCHESON MS (PRESIDENT, ED, & DIRECTOR)
  • MASON MITCHELL-DANIELS MSW MPH (VICE PRESIDENT & COO)

Highest reported compensation

  • LAURIE B HUTCHESON MS (PRESIDENT, ED, & DIRECTOR): $117,277 total reported compensation
  • MASON MITCHELL-DANIELS MSW MPH (VICE PRESIDENT & COO): $51,196 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

As the only organization in the us dedicated to invasive lobular breast cancer (ilc), lbca's mission is to make all who are touched by ilc aware of its unique characteristics and the critical need for more ilc research; to be the go-to source for (cont'd in schedule o) information on ilc studies, clinical trials and educational tools; to foster partnerships among patients, scientists, clinicians, and breast cancer organizations to increase dialogue about ilc and research advocacy; and to fund vital ilc research.

What it reported doing in 2024

During the last fiscal year, lbca:-launched first october 15th global lobular breast cancer awareness day in collaboration with advocates and researchers around the world and worked with a pr company to raise awareness of ilc and lbca in several key metropolitan areas around the us. Worked with three major cancer centers (dana farber, memorial sloan kettering and md anderson) to encourage their implementing oct 15th ilc awareness raising events and launching their own ilc programs-supported two and launched a third local advocacy team (lat) in cascadia (Oregon and Washington state region) to increase lbca's work with advocates conducting education and research advocacy in their communities (cont'd in schedule o) -created ilc info graphics for centers for disease control and prevention (cdc) and for national cancer institute (nci) breast cancer patient facing pages -produced text for report on ilc and nci seer ilc incidence data that was published on the nci cancer stat facts webpage and will be updated annually.-produced patient resource document on lobular breast cancer myths and facts-funded ilc research grants with society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging (snmmi), asco / conquer cancer foundation, and american association for cancer research. Funded/issued in collaboration with susan g. Komen first ever metastatic ilc research grant solicitation in memory of lbca founding advocate julia k. Levine-helped australia lobular breast cancer patients form lbca-aus for patient advocacy and helped brazilian clinicians develop training curriculum on ilc for mds.-supported launch of two virtual support groups for individuals with metastatic ilc-co-sponsored and presented poster on lbca's october 15th movement at ilc symposium in leuven, belgium in september 2024-produced and presented poster on ilc patient experience with surgical treatment planning in december at san antonio breast cancer symposium 24-developed and shared on website and social media lay summaries of all ilc posters presented at sabcs 24, to make the research presented accessible to lay audiences-initiated, funded and awarded merit scholarships (to cover conference attendance travel costs) for top five best ilc research posters presented at sabcs24 via administrative partnership with aacr. Developed and shared on website/newsletter, lay summaries of 25 ilc research posters presented at sabcs including merit winners.-managed website with (ever-increasing hits) that provides detailed information for the public about invasive lobular breast cancer (ilc), ilc research, clinical trials and patient advocacy opportunities. -hosted 4 webinars for ilc patient advocates on research and other topics, and provided 17 travel scholarships to patient advocates to attend trainings and conferences-released 2 ilc curriculums for clinicians available for viewing as webinars for cmes on memorial sloan kettering (msk) cancer center educational portal-sponsored scientific advisory board meetings to involve ilc researchers in advocacy and in the development of the information lbca disseminates-sponsored patient advocate advisory board meetings to involve ilc patient advocates in ilc awareness raising activities and strategic planning-published monthly newsletter reaching over 7,200 subscribers-added 60+ new ilc studies to the julia k. Levine ilc publications library on the lbca website

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 46% for direct work, and 54% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 72
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.9%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 75.3%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Limited
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Limited
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.6%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.1%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 46.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 49.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.9% of revenue deployed · 75.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $674K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $117K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.