Conquer Cancer, the ASCO Foundation
Legal name: Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311667995
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2020
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, US
- Phone
- 571-483-1700
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,435,619
- Expenses
- $34,781,420
- Assets
- $120,676,056
- Liabilities
- $12,476,623
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NANCY DALY MS MPH (CEO & EXECUTIVE VP)
Highest reported compensation
- CLIFFORD A HUDIS MD (EXECUTIVE VICE CHAIR): $1,139,916 total reported compensation
- NANCY DALY MS MPH (CEO & EXECUTIVE VP): $583,435 total reported compensation
- MELINDA O'LEARY (CFO (PARTIAL YEAR)): $284,857 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Conquer Cancer, the ASCO Foundation, funds research and supports the next generation of cancer researchers to improve the lives of people with cancer.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule o: research: research is how we conquer cancer. It means everything, from understanding how cancer impacts certain people to finding groundbreaking new ways to treat cancer. The conquer cancer grants & awards program has been recognizing excellence in clinical research, quality care, and teaching in the field of oncology since 1984, when the program originally began under the purview of asco. Conquer cancer funds the entire spectrum of research activities related to cancer prevention, screening, treatment, and outcomes research in all cancer types, and supports progress by funding cancer researchers at all stages of their careers, enabling oncology's best and brightest to pursue promising research. Conquer cancer and asco have funded more than $191 million to support grants & awards to over 9,300 recipients in 90 countries. Highlights of 2024 research activities and accomplishments include: *advanced clinical research award (acra): $1,350,000 provided three (3) three-year awards to physician-scientists committed to support clinical cancer research with a patient-oriented focus. Awards supported focused on breast cancer research. *career development award (cda): $4,200,000 provided twenty-one (21) three-year awards intended to support clinical research of clinical investigators who have received their initial faculty appointments and are establishing independent clinical cancer research programs. *young investigator award (yia): $4,560,000 provided ninety-one (91) one-year awards designed to encourage and promote high-quality research in clinical oncology by supporting the research of promising investigators during the transition from a fellowship program to a faculty appointment. *global oncology young investigator award: $300,000 provided five (6) one-year awards to early-career investigators to support research in global oncology and to develop the next generation of researchers to address global health needs. This is a mentored award and the research project is conducted under the guidance of a scientific mentor. *international innovation grant: $39,500 provided two (2) one-year awards in support of novel and innovative projects that have the potential to reduce the cancer burden in local communities, while also being potentially transferrable to other low- or middle- income settings. *long-term international fellowship: $115,000 provided one (1) one year grant whichenables an early career member oncologist in a low to middle income country and their mentor in the united states or canada to extend the collaboration through a research fellowship at the mentor's institution.through its everygrant program, conquer cancer utilizes its skills and expertise in grants administration and program management to collaborate with other organizations to develop and deliver programs that make a difference to cancer care teams and patients everywhere.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 81% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.6%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 66.8%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Pass
- May require repayment: Pass
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.2%; rating input score 95; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.1%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.47; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 60.6% of revenue deployed · 66.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 21 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $23.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 23 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $301K reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 39 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 42 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.