Kuakini Medical Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990074139
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Honolulu, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8085479231
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $163,552,942
- Expenses
- $190,080,383
- Assets
- $153,154,571
- Liabilities
- $148,577,369
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREGG OISHI (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- GREGG OISHI (PRESIDENT & CEO): $395,406 total reported compensation
- JUNE DRUMELLER (EXECUTIVE VP): $357,865 total reported compensation
- JANETTE SEBASTIAN (RN): $302,744 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of kuakini medical center is to improve the health status of the community by: providing comprehensive health care services and programs at reasonable cost; continuously improving the quality of health care services and programs; encouraging clinical research; supporting training and educational programs for health care personnel; and offering community service programs. Kuakini medical center provides acute hospital services, ambulatory care services, emergency room services, teaching services and biomedical research.
What it reported doing in 2024
Kuakini medical center provides hospital care services and ambulatory care services to provide relief to people in the state of Hawaii as a result of illness, poverty, accident or other cause; promotes the general welfare of the community; performs any charitable or benevolent work; establishes and maintains facilities to provide medical services; provides and conducts educational services to render care to the sick and injured; and promotes scientific research relating to the care of the sick and injured.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.9%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.97; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.1%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.9% of revenue deployed · 82.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $157.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $395K · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5M reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.