Kuakini
Legal name: Kuakini Geriatric Care Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990225065
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Honolulu, HI, USA
- Phone
- (808) 536-2236
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,113,003
- Expenses
- $23,841,953
- Assets
- $20,648,814
- Liabilities
- $12,566,088
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREGG OISHI (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- GREGG OISHI (PRESIDENT & CEO): $395,406 total reported compensation
- MA SHARINA MAE AGUILAR (RN): $261,655 total reported compensation
- ZENAIDA C AGUILAR (RN): $209,544 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of kuakini geriatric care, inc. Is to improve the health status of the community by providing comprehensive health care services and programs at reasonable cost, continuously improving the quality of health care services and programs; encouraging clinical research, supporting training and educational programs for health care personnel, and offering community service programs. Kuakini geriatric care, inc. Provides a spectrum of geriatric related programs and services for adults and older adults in need of medical and nursing care and social services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Health care services for adults and older adults through a skilled nursing facility and intermediate care facility, and kuakini home (a residential care home).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 80
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 83%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.2%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.61; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 70.4% of revenue deployed · 83% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $395K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.