Kenosha Human Development Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391200678
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Kenosha, WI, USA
- Phone
- 2627648555
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Group Homes
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,160,517
- Expenses
- $13,513,457
- Assets
- $14,392,756
- Liabilities
- $3,905,309
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEANNINE FIELD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JEANNINE FIELD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $140,402 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide public, individual, and group care for anyone living in the greater kenosha area. Care shall be in the least restrictive manner and will include group type treatment facilities, as well as other services to help people in need learn new skills and adapt to acceptable community living standards and practices. Kenosha human development services, inc., is a community resource and partner working in cooperation with social, health, and family service branches of county, state, and federal government.
What it reported doing in 2024
Homeless assistance services - the division of homeless assistance services is designed to provide access to shelter, homeless programming, and community resources with the goal of helping people end their homelessness. To achieve that goal, we have a comprehensive response in place that ensures homelessness is prevented whenever possible, or if it can't be prevented, it is a rare, brief, and a one-time experience. Khds acts as the lead for kenosha area coordinated entry providers to ensure our community prioritizes assistance based on vulnerability and severity of service needs. In 2024 the organization provided 943 nights of emergency motel vouchers to get 209 and 119 children into safe shelters. Our outreach team served 199 people to get them off the streets and into safe shelter.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 96% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $104.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.7%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $11.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $140K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.