Join Together Northern Nevada
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880387740
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Reno, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7753247557
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Prevention Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,120,478
- Expenses
- $1,114,826
- Assets
- $574,219
- Liabilities
- $99,863
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANNE-ELIZABETH NORTHAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 425)
Highest reported compensation
- ANNE-ELIZABETH NORTHAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 425): $83,996 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Jtnns mission is to bring citizens, agencies, businesses, and government together in a collaborative effort to create safe, healthy, drug-free communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Jtnn supports collaboration with individuals, community agencies, businesses and government to best utilize available resources and reach a wide public audience. Annually, jtnn provides more than 1,000 students with prevention programming, trains more than 250 counselors, social workers, and psychologists from washoe county school district, and provides educational programs to more than 400 community members. Jtnn engaged in the development and dissemination of multi-faceted substance misuse public awareness campaigns to address vaping, harm reduction, overdose, opiods, marijuana, and other drugs. These campaigns reach more than 71,000 people on social media. And approximately 800,000 people on other media sources. Jtnn also distributed more than 220 lock boxes and deterra bags for safe disposal of medications.(continued on schedule o)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 82% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.5%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $64.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 90.5%; rating input score 91; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.5% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $969K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 30 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D revenue reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.