Boys and Girls Club of Truckee Meadows
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880142068
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- Reno, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7753313605
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Boys and Girls Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $29,688,647
- Expenses
- $26,790,164
- Assets
- $77,311,386
- Liabilities
- $763,990
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
40 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL WURM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL WURM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $358,058 total reported compensation
- JULIE ROWE (VP OF STRATEGY): $159,944 total reported compensation
- ALISON ELDER (VP OF FINANCE): $154,889 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The boys & girls club enables youth to realize their potential for growth and development. The organization helps its members acquire needed skills for development. The organization helps its members acquire needed skills for living through relevant, substantial, and diversified programming. Services are made possible by informed and involved leadership, by professional and enthusiastic staff, and by utilizing a broad funding base stemming from an interested, responsive, and very involved community in the truckee meadows.
What it reported doing in 2024
Youth programming: the club provides before- and after-school programs at sites throughout the areas of truckee meadows, fernley, winnemucca, ely, tonopah, and lovelock. Before-school programs provide the first meal of the day for its members and preparation for the upcoming day of school. After-school programs provide homework assistance and activities which include sports leagues, video games, and art programs, as well as providing snacks and the evening meal. Track-break programming is also provided for students on multi-track and year-round school programs and is offered to students between the ages of 6 through 12.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and the available information about grant readiness federal audit leaves an important question unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $941.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.8%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.89; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 34 of 34 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $23M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $358K · 40 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.8M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.