Jewish United Fund
Legal name: Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 362167034
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Chicago, IL, United States
- Phone
- 312-346-6700
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $154,199,770
- Expenses
- $140,164,885
- Assets
- $261,466,749
- Liabilities
- $57,141,360
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
113 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID S ROSEN (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT - ENDOWMENTS)
- JAMES A PINKSTON (VICE PRESIDENT - ACCOUNTING)
- JAY TCATH (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- John A LOWENSTEIN (Senior Vice President, Engagement)
- LONNIE NASATIR (PRESIDENT/CEO)
- ROBERT A SCHUCKMAN (VICE PRESIDENT - GENERAL COUNSEL)
Highest reported compensation
- LONNIE NASATIR (PRESIDENT/CEO): $668,514 total reported compensation
- JAY TCATH (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $576,578 total reported compensation
- DAVID S ROSEN (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT - ENDOWMENTS): $558,732 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
JUF powers Jewish Chicago—because people like you power JUF. As one of the largest social service organizations in the country, JUF is committed to eradicating hunger, isolation and inequities for Chicagoans of all faiths and for people around the world. We are staunchly committed to fighting antisemitism and hate in all forms.
What it reported doing in 2024
ALLOCATIONS (LOCAL) - THE JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO (JUF) CONDUCTS FUNDRAISING ACTIVITIES BY MEANS OF ANNUAL CALENDAR YEAR CAMPAIGNS AND MAKES ALLOCATIONS TO JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO (JF) AND JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA (JFNA). THROUGH ITS ALLOCATION TO JF, JUF SUPPORTS VARIOUS NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS IN THE CHICAGO AREA THAT PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO PEOPLE OF ALL FAITHS, INCLUDING HOT MEALS AND GROCERIES, UTILITY AND RENT ASSISTANCE, PRESCRIPTIONS AND MEDICAL CARE FOR IMPOVERISHED FAMILIES; JOB TRAINING AND PLACEMENT FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE OUT OF WORK; MULTI-FACETED, SPECIALIZED SUPPORT SERVICES FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES; SUPPORT SERVICES FOR HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS; CARE AND TRANSPORTATION FOR SENIORS; RESPITE SERVICES FOR CAREGIVERS OF FRAIL SENIORS AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES; COUNSELING, PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION SERVICES FOR TROUBLED TEENS; AND AN ENTIRE CONTINUUM OF PREVENTION AND THERAPEUTIC SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES IN CRISIS. BECAUSE THE JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO AND THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ARE SO CLOSELY LINKED IN NUMEROUS WAYS (COMBINED BOARD OF DIRECTORS, SHARED PROFESSIONAL STAFF, SHARED OFFICE SPACE, ETC.), AND BECAUSE JUF PROVIDES AN ANNUAL, MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR ALLOCATION TO THE JEWISH FEDERATION, WE MEASURE AND REPORT OUR PROGRAM AND SERVICE RESULTS JOINTLY FOR THE COMBINED JUF/FEDERATION ENTERPRISE, WHICH ARE SUMMARIZED BELOW: MEETING BASIC HUMAN NEEDS As one of the nation's largest humanitarian organizations, JUF meets the most fundamental needs of the community-feeding people who are hungry, providing emergency financial support, and protecting the health and well-being of those in need of care. Helping people keep food on their tables and a roof overhead. * 20,000 individuals received food assistance, including meals, food bags and packages in FY25. * 880 individuals received affordable housing services and 500 people lived in JUF-supported affordable housing. * More than 5,000 households received $24 million in financial aid- a 16 percent increase in households assisted and 27 percent increase in dollars distributed. * 4,400 people- including more than 2,000 children-- received in-kind essentials, such as school supplies, winter coats and tech devices. * 8,000 individuals received assistance gaining or maintaining public benefits. Providing access to life-saving medical care and essential mental health services. * 64,000 people in need received direct healthcare including primary medical care, dental, and access to health screenings. * More than 2,600 people received prescription medications. * 27,500 individuals received mental health services or education. * 4,600 individuals were served to reduce isolation. Helping people build new lives in a new country. * 11,700 immigrants and refugees received support from JUF agencies in 2025, ranging from food and housing to job placement and assistance on the path to citizenship-a 22% increase over last year. * 8,500 refugees received ongoing resettlement services, a 50% increase over the prior year Promoting inclusion, individualism and independence for people with disabilities. * A record 4,600 people with disabilities received support from JUF and its agencies, ranging from employment assistance to school and Jewish summer camp-- a 20% increase. * 1,400 family members and caregivers of people with disabilities increased knowledge, skills, and access to resources to support their loved ones. * 1,700 children and youth with developmental delays or disabilities were served in school-based settings. Providing holistic support to sustain Holocaust survivors * 1,700 Holocaust survivors received a range of supportive services, from financial aid to socialization. * Financial aid to survivors totaled $17.3 million, an increase of 11% over last year. * More than $1.2 million in food support. Helping people help themselves. *4,000 people received employment services in 2025. *1,600
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 91% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.4%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 84.5%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.4%; rating input score 99; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.1%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.87; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 89.4% of revenue deployed · 84.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 87 of 87 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $118.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $669K · 113 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.9M reported
- Consistency: 42 of 43 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 63 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 80 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.