American Friends of the Hebrew University

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
131568923
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
212.607.8500
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Single Organization Support
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$99,962,744
Expenses
$78,530,962
Assets
$1,037,236,995
Liabilities
$54,506,837

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

69 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAMELA N EMMERICH (PRESIDENT)
  • KENNETH L STEIN ESQ (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • RONALD M ZIMMERMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOSHUA REDNIK (CEO)
  • MAURA MILLES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - NE REGION)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOSHUA REDNIK (CEO): $549,633 total reported compensation
  • EILEEN HUME (CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER): $401,628 total reported compensation
  • ALISON FREED (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $394,622 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

American Friends of the Hebrew University (AFHU) is a national, not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organization with offices throughout the United States. AFHU’s mission is to raise funds for, and increase awareness of, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HU), expanding support for Israel’s leading institution of higher learning and research.

What it reported doing in 2024

American friends of hebrew university ("afhu") advances the mission of hebrew university of jerusalem by mobilizing philanthropic support from donors in the united states to strengthen excellence in higher education, research, and innovation. Afhu raises and administers charitable contributions to support academic programs, faculty, students, and research initiatives at hebrew university, one of israel's leading institutions of higher learning. Through unrestricted and donor restricted gifts, afhu supports scholarships and fellowships, faculty recruitment and retention, scientific and medical research, academic departments, and infrastructure projects that promote educational access, intellectual advancement, and global collaboration. Afhu also facilitates engagement between u.s. Supporters and the university by providing information about academic priorities, research breakthroughs, and the societal impact of hebrew university's work. All grants and transfers to hebrew university are made in furtherance of afhu's charitable purposes and in accordance with donor intent. Afhu exercises oversight to ensure that funds are applied to educational, research, and related charitable uses consistent with applicable u.s. Tax exempt requirements.for the year ending september 30, 2025, afhu identified approximately $7.8m in donations directly to hebrew university that were a direct result of afhu's fundraising and marketing efforts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some related-organization disclosures are missing.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.4%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.5%; rating input score 90; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Limited
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 87.8%; rating input score 88; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.4%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.21; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 75.4% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 60 of 60 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $66M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $550K · 69 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2M reported
  • Consistency: 44 of 46 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.