Jewish Home at Home Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271101121
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2010
Location
Rockleigh, NJ, USA
Phone
2017841414
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,335
Expenses
$2,257
Assets
$12,844
Liabilities
$145,248

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CAROL SILVER ELLIOTT (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • CAROL SILVER ELLIOTT (PRESIDENT & CEO): $725,305 total reported compensation
  • BRANDY M STEFANCO (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $354,450 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Providing charitable services to the elderly or infirm to assist them to continue to reside in their home environment.

What it reported doing in 2024

The mission of jewish home at home is to provide excellence and innovation in community based services for the care of older adults, reflecting our jewish values of compassion, dignity, integrity and respect.our home care is designed to help older adults and their families meet the challenges of aging in one's own home. Our goal is to help seniors remain at home, well cared for and secure while maintaining the highest level of independence and quality of life.our gallen center remains closed since the covid pandemic and there are currently no active operations.continued on schedule o.jewish home at home provides an interdisciplinary approach to address the complex needs and preferences of the older person by identification of senior's unique care needs through an in-home assessment and consultation with family members. Jewish home at home assists withshort-term and long-term care planning, ongoing monitoring with recommendations for changes as needed, utilization of financial resources for maximum benefit, and assistance with implementation of the plan of care. Our goal is to assist in strengthening clients andtheir families to allow them to achieve the goals they have set for themselves.jewish home at home is a non-sectarian program open to all seniors regardless of race, religion or ethnic origin.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - Most voting board members are independent and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 38.4%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -69.1%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.69; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 11.31; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4,393.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 38.4% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $725K · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.