International Justice Mission

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
541722887
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Arlington, VA, USA
Phone
7034655495
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
International Human Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$129,931,939
Expenses
$111,722,536
Assets
$97,716,896
Liabilities
$39,502,695

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

31 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GARY HAUGEN (CEO)
  • SAJU MATHEW (REGIONAL PRESIDENT, SOUTH ASIA)

Highest reported compensation

  • GARY HAUGEN (CEO): $406,590 total reported compensation
  • BIJU MATHEW (REGIONAL VP, STRATEGY & OPERATIONS): $361,173 total reported compensation
  • SHAWN KOHL (COUNTRY DIRECTOR, ROMANIA): $359,604 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

International Justice Mission partners with local authorities in program offices to combat slavery, violence against women and children, and police abuse of power—protecting people in poverty from violence by rescuing victims, bringing criminals to justice, restoring survivors to safety and strength, and helping local law enforcement build a safe future that lasts.

What it reported doing in 2024

Field operationsinternational justice mission's field operations respond to a vast and devastating category of need: violence against people in poverty.the threat of violence is part of everyday life for people who are poor. According to the global slavery index, approximately 50 million people are estimated to be living in situations of modern slavery. The international labor organization estimates that forced labor generates profits in excess of more than $236 billion annually for traffickers and slave owners; and according to global estimates of modern slavery, 1 in 4 victims of modern slavery is a child. In many countries, perpetrators of abuse against people in poverty (see schedule o)expect no consequences for their crimes, despite laws against the crime.ijm attorneys, investigators, social workers, community activists and other professionals work in 32 communities throughout africa, latin america, europe, south asia and southeast asia to collaborate with justice system and community leaders to respond effectively to violence. Ijm's teams protect people in poverty from violence, including crimes like slavery, violence against women and children, and police abuse of power. By collaborating with communities and governments, ijm serves individual victims of violence and pursues significant improvements in the justice system to protect all people vulnerable to the crime.for over 25 years, ijm and our partners have worked alongside local authorities to build communities where all people are safe and protected. Together, we have learned how to create improvements within justice systems that measurably reduce violence and serve survivors with dignity. Ijm does this in the following ways: strengthen justice systemsijm collaborates with justice system and community leaders to respond effectively to violence. Together, we create improvements that serve survivors, deter criminals and dramatically decrease violence.rescue and restore victimsijm partners with local authorities to rescue individual victims of violence and restore survivors to safety and stability.bring criminals to justiceijm works alongside justice system officials to ensure that criminals are held accountable, stopping the cycle of violence and deterring others from abusing vulnerable people.scale demand for protectionijm convenes and equips champions to advocate for protection as an essential and tangible future for everyone.during the last year, ijm, our partners and trained governments brought freedom to 3,597 victims of violence and oppression. Each victory reflects the tenacious work of ijm's attorneys, social workers, and investigators. Their efforts continue long after rescue, as survivors heal and rebuild their lives with ijm's aftercare support while the legal process for each case unfolds over months or even years.during the last year, a total of 2,988 suspected perpetrators were restrained and 1,282 criminals in local courts were convicted. Additionally, 230 survivors were restored to safety and stability. Finally, ijm trained over 43,590 people to recognize and respond to violence, including over 21,338 justice system officials (such as police, prosecutors, judges and social workers) and collectively over 22,252 church and community members, NGO partners, media and students.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 78
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.6%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 69.5%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Pass
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 83.8%; rating input score 84; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 60.6% of revenue deployed · 69.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $77.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $407K · 31 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.4M reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 24 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.