INTEGRIS Health

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932826081
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, US
Phone
405-949-3011
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,093,449
Expenses
$44,985,669
Assets
$28,832,634
Liabilities
$43,533,559

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KENAN KIRKENDALL DO (DIRECTOR & Medical staff president)
  • Timothy Pehrson (Director & President/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Timothy Pehrson (Director & President/CEO): $3,100,107 total reported compensation
  • Michael Weed (Treasurer & CFO): $1,181,042 total reported compensation
  • MARION JOHNSON (Director of Finance): $265,463 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Caring for our patients is our top priority.

What it reported doing in 2024

Integris health woodward hospital, inc. ("ihwh") is a member of the integris health system (integris health). Integris health is the state's largest Oklahoma-owned health care corporation and one of the state's largest private employers (about 10,000 employees statewide), with hospitals, rehabilitation centers, physician clinics, mental health facilities, fitness centers, independent living centers and home health agencies throughout much of the state. Integris health woodward is a cornerstone of health care in woodward, Oklahoma. We are committed to providing comprehensive, high-quality medical services to our community. With a focus on cutting-edge technology and personalized care, our hospital is equipped to meet a wide range of health care needs from emergency care to specialized treatments in orthopedics and women's health. Our dedication extends beyond the walls of the hospital. We are invested in the well-being of our community, offering educational resources, wellness programs and outreach initiatives to improve public health. As a member of integris health and a not-for-profit organization, each year ihwh provides millions of dollars of charity care to patients throughout the state of Oklahoma. While this care represents a large percentage of ihwh's gift back to the community, it is still only part of what ihwh chooses to call returnship. Returnship epitomizes ihwh's mission of giving back to its community. It takes the form of hundreds of programs and acts of charity provided daily across the state of Oklahoma - free health screenings, support groups, medical services, educational programs, health fairs and more. In addition, ihwh provides significant amounts of uncompensated services. Uncompensated services are the costs of providing free and reduced cost care, which includes charity care and unpaid costs of medicaid programs. As a not-for-profit hospital, ihwh provides services to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay or their insurance coverage. Thus, it provides a much-needed safety net for members of the ihwh community who would otherwise have no access to medical care. Charity care costs are based on the overall hospital cost to charge ratios. Ihwh provided charity care of $578,786. Ihwh also provides care to patients who qualify for medicaid programs for which the organization receives inadequate payments in prior years. Unpaid costs of medicaid programs reflect the difference between costs to provide patient care services and the rate at which the hospital is reimbursed. Medicaid costs are based on the overall hospital cost to charge ratios. Ihpch did not have unpaid cost in the fiscal year and as a result chose to reinvest the funding back into the community by focusing on the community needs as documented in schedule h.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 96% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -40.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.51; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 41.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -33.9% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $3.1M · 16 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $8.2M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 27 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.