INTEGRIS So Oklahoma City Hosp Corp Dba INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center I Nc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731089149
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4059496026
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $358,483,886
- Expenses
- $335,373,223
- Assets
- $273,497,171
- Liabilities
- $9,686,638
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Timothy Pehrson (Director & President/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Timothy Pehrson (Director & President/CEO): $3,100,107 total reported compensation
- Brent Hubbard (Director /IH COO): $1,261,482 total reported compensation
- Michael Weed (Treasurer & CFO): $1,181,042 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health of the people and communities we serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
Integris southwest medical center, inc. (ismc) is a member of the integris health system (integris health). Integris health is the state's largest Oklahoma-owned health care corporation and one of the state's largest private employers (over 10,000 employees statewide), with hospitals, rehabilitation centers, physician clinics, mental health facilities, fitness centers, independent living centers and home health agencies throughout much of the state. See schedule o for more information.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.8%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 82.4%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 45%; rating input score 45; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.8% of revenue deployed · 82.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 20 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $276.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.1M · 26 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $21.1M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 27 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 45/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.