Infirmary Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 630870620
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mobile, AL, USA
- Phone
- 2514353030
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,289,960
- Expenses
- $1,988,196
- Assets
- $46,336,880
- Liabilities
- $212,671
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- D MARK NIX (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- D MARK NIX (PRESIDENT): $1,900,471 total reported compensation
- SCOTT BROWNING (ASSISTANT SE): $586,576 total reported compensation
- ROBISON MCCLURE JR (VICE PRESIDE): $225,430 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Infirmary foundation's purpose is to advance the promotion of health, support the purposes of mobile infirmary association and other 501(c)(3) affiliates, and encourage public support of such organizations.
What it reported doing in 2024
The ernest g. Debakey drug education program is a mobile state-of-the-art education bus and also a website that contains all the videos and educational material that is contained in the bus. The bus travels to public, private and parochial schools throughout seven counties in southwest Alabama and Florida to provide fifth-grade students with information about the dangers of drug use and abuse. In 427 programs, 5,434 students visited the drug bus. During the summer, on weekends, and evenings, we service younger children, middle school students, teenagers and adults at the following: boys and girls club after school and summer camps, ymca aftercare, summer camps, church health fairs, community events, business health fairs, infirmary events, world of opportunity, and church festivals. The main goal of the website is to make our program available to schools outside of our traveling area. Anyone can access our site. Schools and other organizations are using the site to go over drug education in their classes. The website averages 6,900 hits per month. Www.debakeydrugeducation.com
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 90% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.9%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 61.1%; rating input score 61
- Fundraising efficiency: $687.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.8%; rating input score 97; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.1%; rating input score 87; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 53.7%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 23.31; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.5%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.9% of revenue deployed · 61.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 27 of 31 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.9M · 33 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 15 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.