Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
371056288
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Springfield, IL, USA
Phone
2177892830
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,845,837
Expenses
$13,859,465
Assets
$3,656,020
Liabilities
$2,656,710

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHARON SPIKS (PRESIDENT)
  • MARY ELLEN SCHADEND 6302025 (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SARAH CONLON (INTERIM CEO AND COO)
  • CARRIE BOYD START 1132025 (PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • SARAH CONLON (INTERIM CEO AND COO): $123,378 total reported compensation
  • JAMIE JOHNSTON (CFO): $104,176 total reported compensation
  • LORI MCCOLLUM (CHIEF SUB ADMIN OFFICER): $81,780 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Vision statement: icadv envisions a statewide community committed to exposing the root causes of domestic abuse and ensuring safety for families by supporting the voices of all survivors.mission statement: icadv builds networks of support for and with survivors, and advances statewide policies and practices that transform societal attitudes and institutions to eliminate and prevent domestic abuse.

What it reported doing in 2024

Training and public education materials & advocacy program- icadv is the federally designated statewide coalition composed of domestic violence services providers who reach domestic violence survivors and their children in each of Illinois' 102 counties with meaningful, life-saving, and diverse services. 50,669 survivors and child witnesses sought and received from icadv member domestic violence agencies: emergency shelter, legal advocacy, counseling, and support accessing other assistance to help them achieve self-sufficiency on a path to safety. However, there are many victims who never seek assistance from a domestic violence provider. Survivors have specific needs to support their safety, whether it be access to affordable housing when they leave an abusive home, job training because the person causing them harm has prohibited them from working or participating in skills training or finding other means to support themselves and their children. In the course of seeking these options, they encounter other professionals who may not understand how their policies or procedures for providing that specific service may have a negative impact on a survivor, prohibits them from moving forward, and possibly leaving no option but to return home to an abusive environment. We help bring awareness and education about the needs of those experiencing violence and help improve the response survivors receive from those professionals by offering training and awareness materials. Our primary audience for training is professionals working every day in domestic violence service provider agencies, expanding their knowledge to better assist survivors whose needs are different and complex. These service providers step up and recognize the very diverse needs of individual survivors in communities throughout the entire state and we provide them to the training tools to stay up on to date on emerging trends, including addressing specific barriers created by the covid 19 pandemic. Fy 25, icadv hosted 47 in person and virtual trainings for 2191 participants including victim service advocates, legal/justice personnel, mental health professionals and other professionals, increasing their knowledge about the dynamics of domestic violence, how their work impacts a survivor's safety and confidentiality, and increasing their skills for responding appropriately to survivors of domestic violence and their children. This provided a total of over 7,566 hours of live training. In addition, icadv provided a series of online training modules as well through its learning management system. 597 online modules were completed. Icadv distributed thousands of brochures educating survivors and the public on the issue of domestic violence. These materials are provided in 13 languages other then english ensuring maximum accessibility for survivors. Items were distributed to organizations who are working with survivors and their children including domestic violence providers, legal/justice organizations, mental health services, attorneys, medical organizations, government entities, and for-profit groups. Icadv also conducted community education at events throughout the state reaching 1,145 individuals with information about the causes of domestic violence and how survivors can find support in their communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 79% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.9%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 96.8%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: $619.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.73; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.8%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.9% of revenue deployed · 96.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $13.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $123K · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 60 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 55 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.