Huntington's Disease Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237376197
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2129282121
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Birth Defects, Genetic Diseases Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,081,669
- Expenses
- $4,326,391
- Assets
- $23,135,759
- Liabilities
- $2,314,242
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MEGHAN DONALDSON (CEO)
- NANCY S WEXLER PHD (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SARAH HERNANDEZ PHD (DIR. OF RESEARCH PROGRAMS): $216,927 total reported compensation
- JULIE PORTER (DIR. OF ADMINISTRATION): $157,541 total reported compensation
- KAREN NEWMAN (CHAIR): $72,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To fund transformative research to find treatments, and ultimately a cure, for huntington's disease.
What it reported doing in 2025
Huntington's disease foundation (hdf) advances paradigm-changing huntington's disease (hd) research through a collaborative approach to scientific discovery. We invest in research by providing senior scientists with grants, including our million-dollar transformative research awards, which began in 2023, and funding the work of early career scientists through postdoctoral fellowships. We champion collaborative science by organizing both small thinktank-style workshops and large scientific conferences which enable experts in hd to share their latest discoveries, explore cutting-edge technologies, and form collaborations. We highlight for the public notable work of scientists through our webinars.(continued on schedule o)in its early years, research organized and funded by the hdf was the catalyst for the work that isolated the gene that causes huntington's disease. This finding led to the development of a genetic test for hd and launched modern research efforts. The huntington's disease foundation supports research through several funding opportunities.hdf research grants: one-year grants provide senior researchers with seed funding to enable them to collect the preliminary data needed to obtain major, long-term funding from other organizations, including the nih.hdf postdoctoral fellowships: two-year fellowships fund the work of early-career scientists. These fellowships are intended to encourage and cultivate interest in huntington's disease research.transformative research awards: these million-dollar research awards, hdf's largest grants, fund collaborative research teams to create innovative ways to study new pathogenic disease mechanisms and treatment modalities in huntington's disease.hd career advancement grants: these are our newest awards with grants beginning in 2025. This incubator program supports young investigators by providing resources and tools to build the necessary skills to bridge the transition from postdoctoral position to tenure-track primary investigator. Our goal through this program and our postdoctoral fellowships is to engage and retain the brightest minds in hd research by funding and mentoring early-career scientists.hdf-funded researchers have made significant strides in applying advanced techniques such as artificial intelligence (ai), crispr and brain mapping, leading to tremendous promise for potential treatments for huntington's disease.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 83% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.8%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.35; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.8% of revenue deployed · 87.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $217K · 21 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.