Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 590735717
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Chevy Chase, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3012158500
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Biomedicine, Bioengineering Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,004,784,057
- Expenses
- $1,178,202,544
- Assets
- $29,497,763,012
- Liabilities
- $1,879,493,442
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
34 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERIN K O'SHEA PHD (PRESIDENT)
- SETH GROSSMAN ESQ (VP, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER & SENIOR ADVISOR TO THE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DONALD KOCH (VP & CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER): $2,004,966 total reported compensation
- ERIN K O'SHEA PHD (PRESIDENT): $1,721,384 total reported compensation
- MARK SPROLES (MANAGING DIRECTOR, PRIVATE MARKETS): $1,244,070 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. As its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human knowledge by conducting discovery research and science education, principally within fields associated with basic biomedical sciences, and the dissemination and application of that knowledge for the benefit of humanity.
What it reported doing in 2024
Medical research organization activities the hhmi investigator program the howard hughes medical institute's approach to biomedical research can be summarized in three words: people, not projects. This commitment is reflected in the hhmi investigator program. Rather than awarding research grants, this program employs scientists, providing them with long-term, flexible funding that they may use to pursue their scientific interests. Hhmi believes that scientists of exceptional talent and imagination will make fundamental discoveries of lasting scientific value andthatbenefithuman healthif they are given the resources, time, and freedom to pursue challenging questions. Hhmi investigators receive a seven-year appointment, which isrenewablepending favorable scientific review. Among the more than265 current hhmi investigators, 16 arenobel laureates andnearly150aremembers of the national academy of sciences. Hhmi investigators direct hhmi research laboratorieslocatedon the campuses ofmore than 55hospitals, universities, and other researchinstitutionsthroughout the united states. Since the early 1990s, investigators have been selected through rigorous national competitions. The institutesolicitsapplications directly from scientists at research institutions in the united states, with the aim ofidentifyingthose who have the potential to make significant contributions to science. Hhmi employs an open application process to ensure that it selects its researchers from a broad and deep pool of scientific talent. Janelia research campus hhmi's janelia research campus in ashburn, Virginia, innovates research practices, tools, and technologies to solve biology's deepest mysteries. At janelia, integrated teams of lab scientists and tool-builders pursue a small number of key scientific questions with the potential for transformative impact. To drive science, these discoveries are shared openly with the scientific community. In fy24, hhmi announced ai@hhmi, a 10-year, $500 million investment to support ai-driven projects and embed ai systems throughout every stage of the scientific process. In fy25, the institute announced six ambitious ai projects spearheaded by both hhmi investigators and janelia group leaders. In the current fiscal year, there were27group leaders,16senior group leaders, and8janelia scholars at janelia, in addition to graduate students, postdocs, and visiting scientists. Janelia also hosts a vibrant scientific conference program, which brings many scientists to its campus each year for educational meetings. The freeman hrabowski scholars program the freeman hrabowski scholars program supports outstanding early career basic researchers who have strong potential to become leaders in their fields. Scholars prioritize scientific excellence in their own research while creating lab climates in which everyone can thrive. Like hhmi investigators, scholars are employees of the institutebased at hospitals, universities, and other research institutes in the united states, andareprovided with long-term, flexible funding to pursue their boldest ideas. Each scholar is appointed for up to two five-year terms. Inthe summer of 2025, hhmi announced its second cohort of freeman hrabowski scholars: 30 exceptional scientists from 23 u.s. Research institutions. Once appointed, they will join the 31 inaugural freeman hrabowski scholars.the program is named after freeman a. Hrabowski iii, president emeritus of the university of Maryland, baltimore county.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 86.9%; rating input score 87; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.2%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 25.04; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $944.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2M · 34 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $20.7M reported
- Consistency: 43 of 44 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 66 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 71 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.