Whitehead Institute

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
061043412
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Cambridge, MA, United States
Phone
617 258.5000
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Biomedicine, Bioengineering Research

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$222,267,487
Expenses
$174,270,117
Assets
$973,242,315
Liabilities
$144,572,773

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR RUTH LEHMANN (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)
  • MR MARTIN MULLINS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DR RUTH LEHMANN (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT): $1,081,921 total reported compensation
  • MR MARTIN MULLINS (VICE PRESIDENT): $598,203 total reported compensation
  • MS SHARON STANCZAK (VP & SECRETARY (END 12/2024)): $500,911 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

_The process of developing our mission and values—which engaged primary investigators, staff scientists, trainees, administrative staff and the board of directors—resulted in a contemporary restatement of our long-standing mission: It specifically articulates our purpose, who we are, what we do, and how we do it. We are excited to present this restatement of Whitehead Institute’s mission and of the values we deem essential to our success._ Whitehead Institute’s mission is to forge new frontiers in science, uncovering insights today that unlock the potential of tomorrow. We are a biological research institute dedicated to making paradigm-shifting insights into the fundamental principles of li.

What it reported doing in 2024

Whitehead institute for biomedical research is an independent nonprofit research institution located in cambridge, Massachusetts. The institute was incorporated in 1981 to promote and expand human knowledge in the biomedical and other scientific fields with the ultimate goal of improving human health and well-being. The research of the institute focuses on basic biological processes investigated mainly from a molecular or cellular perspective. Research is conducted in several areas, including cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, regenerative biology, immunology and genetics. The research of the institute is conducted under the leadership of principal investigators who hold joint appointments to the faculties of the institute and Massachusetts institute of technology ("mit") (the "institute faculty"). The members of the institute faculty are recognized leaders in their fields. The institute faculty include two recipients of the national medal of science, six howard hughes medical institute investigators, ten members of the national academy of sciences and six members of the national academy of medicine. For more than three decades, whitehead institute has maintained a steadfast commitment to science education and outreach by offering programs to enhance science teaching and learning for the entire community. With a variety of programs ranging in scope from lectures and workshops for teachers and students to special events for non-scientists, whitehead offers its participants first-hand exposure to state-of-the-art research. These programs include: seminar series for high school teachers - this monthly program provides educators and opportunity to explore topics at the forefront of biomedical research. The series begins in october and lectures are held the first monday of every month through june. Spring lecture series for high school students - this program, held during the public school spring vacation week, features lectures from leading scientific experts, hands-on laboratory demonstrations, visits to local biotechnology companies, and interactions with young whitehead institute scientists. Science weeks for middle school students - whitehead institute has developed immersive, week-long programs for rising 6th, 7th, and 8th graders featuring hands-on activities, classroom lessons, and interactions with scientists. Two such sessions are held in the summer months. Public program collaborations - whitehead institute routinely partners with various research institutions and biotechnology organizations in coordinating educational programming for high school students, teachers, and scientists.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 73% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.6%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 87.3%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.6%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.58; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 93.6% of revenue deployed · 87.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $152.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 28 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.9M reported
  • Consistency: 44 of 44 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 21 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.