Housing for Health Orange County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 873137292
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Irvine, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9494019591
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,266,355
- Expenses
- $980,780
- Assets
- $692,243
- Liabilities
- $190,714
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Larry Haynes (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Heather Stratman (Chief Administrative Officer): $144,014 total reported compensation
- Rachel Steinmetz (COO (end March)): $33,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Housing for Health Orange County, Inc (HHOC) is a nonprofit organization that was created to establish an operational oversight umbrella and collaborative forum among local housing service providers. HHOC provides centralized administrative & financial support to these providers, and assists in training, compliance oversight, and development of standards of service delivery to ensure quality outcomes for the clients served. We provide services to expand provider capacity in order to serve and house more homeless and at risk individuals, to improve system flow through a streamlines navigation process and empower individuals with client-centered, trauma informed supportive services.
What it reported doing in 2024
HHOC provides centralized administrative & financial support to these providers, and provide training, compliance oversight, standards of service delivery to ensure quality outcomes for the clients served. We provide services to expand provider capacity in order to serve and house more homeless and at risk individuals, to improve system flow through a streamlines navigation process and empower individuals with client-centered, trauma informed supportive services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.5%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 54.9%; rating input score 55
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.6%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -55.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 38.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.5% of revenue deployed · 54.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $538K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $144K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.