Hospice Care by Pennswood Village

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471563338
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Newtown, PA, USA
Phone
2159689110
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Health Support Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$23,915
Assets
$6,319
Liabilities
$6,319

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIEL MURRAY (CEO OF PENNSWOOD VILLAGE)
  • CHARLES WHITLOCK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • LANCE MERVINE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DANIEL MURRAY (CEO OF PENNSWOOD VILLAGE)
  • THOMAS ATKINS (COO OF PENNSWOOD VILLAGE)
  • TIM MCQUAID (CFO OF PENNSWOOD VILLAGE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hospice care by pennswood village (hcpv) provides physical care that promotes comfort and offers individualized emotional and practical support for persons nearing the end of life.

What it reported doing in 2024

Hospice care by pennswood village (hcpv), guided by quaker principles and traditions, honors those we are privileged to serve by providing person-centered care during the end stages of life. Hcpv's vision is to develop a supportive environment valuing the light within each person allowing those we serve to maximize the quality of their lives as they progress through the end stages of life. Through excellence in personalized care and innovation, hcpv seeks to meet the physical, social and spiritual needs of those we serve. Hcpv stopped accepting applications for admissions effective march 31, 2024. Management is currently assessing all options for the future of hcpv and has arranged with local hospices in the area to continue providing exceptional services for the residents.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 33
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 86.5%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.