Pennswood Village Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 830575873
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Newtown, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2159689110
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $174,654
- Expenses
- $174,654
- Assets
- $25,000
- Liabilities
- $24,500
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL MURRAY (DIRECTOR, CEO OF PENNSWOOD)
People named in this filing
- ELEANOR PENNINGTON (CHAIR)
- JIM REICH (VICE CHAIR)
- DANIEL MURRAY (DIRECTOR, CEO OF PENNSWOOD)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Pennswood village foundation's mission is to serve as the philanthropic arm of pennswood village and its related entities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Pennswood village foundation ("foundation") was incorporated in the commonwealth of Pennsylvania on november 28, 2017. The foundation's charitable purpose is to be the philanthropic arm for pennswood village recognized by the internal revenue service as a 501(c)(3) public charity. Pennswood village is a quaker-based continuing care retirement community located in bucks county providing residential, health and community services to its residents. The charitable mission of the foundation is to accept donations and place them in restricted or unrestricted funds based on donor requests. The foundation's board is structured so that each of the pennswood related entities appoints directors to its board.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.8%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.98; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 53.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -16.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.8% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $148K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.