BSA Health System

Legal name: High Plains Baptist Health Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
750800669
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2015
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2015
Location
Amarillo, TX, USA
Phone
806-212-2000
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,104,647
Expenses
$181,960,020
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHEN DALRYMPLE (PRESIDENT/CEO/GENERAL COUNSEL)
  • MARK HOTMANN (SR VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEPHEN DALRYMPLE (PRESIDENT/CEO/GENERAL COUNSEL): $564,625 total reported compensation
  • MARK HOTMANN (SR VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER): $260,677 total reported compensation
  • NITA CAGE (SECRETARY): $57,384 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

BSA Health System is an extensive hospital system providing clinical excellence to the Texas Panhandle and the tri-state area. We are acclaimed for our superior quality and customer service. As the fourth largest employer in Amarillo, our hospital has a medical staff of more than 450 physicians and about 3,000 employees. With our strong commitment to our community, we aim to foster an environment that allows our medical staff to provide superior care in alignment with our mission. BSA Mission Our mission is to provide quality healthcare in Christian love, service and dignity.

What it reported doing in 2015

The organization controls hospitals and other medical facilities that service the health needs of the amarillo, Texas community through its member interest in bsa health system of amarillo, llc. These facilities provide inpatient and outpatient services which cover services including, but not limited to, surgical services, rehab, physical therapy, and hospice. In addition, an emergency room is operated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 77
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,145.1%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 148.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -43% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -37.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $182M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $565K · 7 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $525K reported
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.