Hias Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 135633307
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Silver Spring, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3018447300
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- International Migration, Refugee Issues
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,582,793
- Expenses
- $113,441,101
- Assets
- $72,745,531
- Liabilities
- $38,600,937
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
37 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID WEISS (CEO THEN SEC-TREAS. (EFF. 07/25))
- MARK HETFIELD (PRESIDENT)
- BETH OPPENHEIM (CERO THEN CEO (EFF. 09/25))
- SABRINA LUSTGARTEN BEJMAN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & COO)
Highest reported compensation
- MARK HETFIELD (PRESIDENT): $387,883 total reported compensation
- SABRINA LUSTGARTEN BEJMAN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & COO): $307,540 total reported compensation
- EMILY RUSS (DIRECTOR, RSC): $284,443 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Hias is the international jewish nonprofit that stands for a world in which forcibly displaced people find welcome, safety, and opportunity.(continued on schedule o)there have never been more people seeking safety and so few places willing to protect and welcome them. Over 120 million people are forcibly displaced in the world today. For over 100 years, hias has been there for refugees when and where they need help most. We are a jewish humanitarian organization that works in the united states and internationally, providing vital services to refugees and vulnerable migrants so they can rebuild their lives. In 2025, our country portfolio changed from 25 countries at the start of the calendar year to 12 by year-end.
What it reported doing in 2024
International program service accomplishments: hias delivers critical services to forcibly displaced populations that provide relief from crisis, and support them in rebuilding their lives with dignity. (continued on schedule o)as a result of their experiences - from uprooting their lives to surviving or witnessing violence - many refugees need urgent services as well as long-term support in order to gain greater stability and rebuild their lives.hias partners closely with domestic and international leadership, like the u.s. Department of state and the united nations high commissioner for refugees, as well as refugee agencies and human rights groups. Our well-established partnerships enable us to share our expertise, achieve our advocacy objectives, and maximize our impact. Legal status is critical for refugees. Without legal status, refugees are forced to live on the margins of society, lacking healthcare, education, dignified work, or safe shelter - sometimes for generations. In response to the hundreds of thousands of sudanese refugees who have fled to eastern chad, hias has employed a multifaceted approach centered on risk mitigation, responsive action, and proactive prevention to combat sex-based violence. Within the 2025 calendar year, over 13,000 people have been reached through encouraging a supportive environment for healing and mental health and psychosocial support (mhpss) services such as counseling and community training on how to recognize and respond to emotional distress. Collaborating closely with community stakeholders, hias delivered child protection services and organized awareness campaigns. Hias has directly assisted over 43,000 children through this work. Moreover, hias has directly and indirectly reached over 33,000 people in chad with cash-based interventions and cash and voucher assistance giving beneficiaries the flexibility to meet their own needs while supporting local economies. Examples of hias' impact in the 2025 calendar year: - hias reached nearly 567,000 people worldwide, including the provision of direct services to nearly 320,000 individuals. - hias' mhpss reached over 73,000 people both directly and indirectly. - hias' programs for the prevention of violence against women and girls reached over 80,000 people both directly and indirectly. - hias reached over 81,000 people with legal protection activities globally. - in 2025 calendar year, hias provided cash and voucher assistance to meet the basic needs of forcibly displaced people, reaching over 54,000 people globally.- in 2025, hias provided resettlement support resettling 2,213 refugees in the united states. - in chad, hias administered services to over 257,700 people fleeing violence in sudan and other conflict areas. Hias staff conducted protection activities addressing violence against women and girls reaching over 20,400 people in displaced communities.- in israel, hias is one of the leading legal aid providers for displaced persons, where they served over 1,100 displaced persons directly through legal assistance and representation including palestinians and other refugees facing the threat of deportation in the wake of the ongoing conflict and in the context of war. - in kenya, hias served over 900 people directly with community-based approaches to both individual and group mhpss support. - in venezuela, hias met the water, sanitation, and hygiene needs of over 4,200 displaced people and host populations. - in mexico, hias supported over 1,000 with mhpss; and provided over 3,500 with services to prevent sex-based violence and mitigate its impact. - in ecuador, hias' economic inclusion programs reached over 1,100 people directly through its flagship graduation model approach. Over 19,600 individuals were reached through cash and voucher assistance to meet their basic needs.- in costa rica, hias supported nearly 6,700 individuals directly and indirectly through legal protection programs. - in panama, over 23,000 people were reached wi
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 66% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 66% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 78
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.8%; rating input score 96; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.2% of revenue deployed · 78.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 24 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $88.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $388K · 37 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.1M reported
- Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 45 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 33 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.