Heritage Fund - the Community Foundation of Bartholomew County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 351343903
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Columbus, IN, USA
- Phone
- 8123767772
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,722,235
- Expenses
- $8,226,853
- Assets
- $128,030,247
- Liabilities
- $16,914,074
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRACY SOUZA (PRESIDENT & CEO - PART YEAR)
- EDITH BLAKESLEE (PRESIDENT & CEO - PART YEAR)
Highest reported compensation
- TRACY SOUZA (PRESIDENT & CEO - PART YEAR): $129,850 total reported compensation
- EDITH BLAKESLEE (PRESIDENT & CEO - PART YEAR): $126,963 total reported compensation
- KRISTIN MUNN (EMPLOYEE): $124,571 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire generosity, to gather and grow community leaders, and to act to ensure that bartholomew county is anexceptional place for all to live, learn, work, and play.
What it reported doing in 2025
Heritage fund is the community foundation of bartholomew county. The foundation exists solely for the betterment of the community. Its mission is to provide responsible stewardship of gifts donated for broad charitable purposes, to develop leadership to address community issues, to serve as a catalyst for positive change in partnership with others, and to promote philanthropy within the community. Each year, heritage fund manages a competitive grants process for over $500,000 in unrestricted dollars from the community fund in the areas of opportunity, positive change, community investment, and organizational excellence. The foundation is the key administrator of scholarships for high school seniors in bartholomew county, and conducts the annual selection process for two lilly scholarships. Heritage fund serves as fiscal sponsor for important community projects, two of which are the construction of the commons in 2011, and landmark columbus, a celebration of the design heritage of columbus in 2017. Distribution from the foundations many donor advised, designated, agency and field of interest funds support a broad variety of charitable purposes.the heritage fund board is composed of 26 community leaders. The foundation employs 6 professionals, and enlists the aid of over 50 volunteers who serve on development, grants, outreach, finance and audit, investment and scholarship committees.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 75% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.8%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $24.4 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 88.3%; rating input score 88; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.2%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 44.1%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.56; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.8% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 25 of 26 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 30 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 68 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 66 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.