Head for the Cure Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208345719
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Kansas City, MO, USA
Phone
8162001732
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,493,421
Expenses
$2,547,708
Assets
$712,938
Liabilities
$71,919

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MATT ANTHONY (PRESIDENT/FOUNDER)

People named in this filing

  • DANAY FAST (TREASURER)
  • KRISTA ALLEN (SECRETARY)
  • MATT ANTHONY (PRESIDENT/FOUNDER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the head for the cure foundation (hftc) is threefold: to build awareness, raise funding, and inspire hope for the community of brain cancer patients, their families, friends, caregivers and other supporters, while celebrating their courage, spirit and energy.

What it reported doing in 2024

Head for the cure (hftc) is more than just a fundraising organization; we are a community dedicated to offering connection, hope, and support to those affected by brain cancer. Our mission is to raise funds for brain tumor research and programs that honor and celebrate the lives of patients, caregivers, and their loved ones. In 2024, hftc celebrated its most successful year to date, driven by the guiding threads of "honoring the journey, accelerating the mission." this commitment resulted in raising over $3 million, which will expand our impact on the medical and scientific communities fighting for our brain tumor patients, caregivers, and their loved ones. These funds ensure that we continue honoring and celebrating the lives and legacies of those affected by this disease, ensuring their stories inspire both hope and progress. We amplified our impact by funding innovative research, expanding support programs, and fostering key collaborations with medical professionals nationwide.our core belief that no one fights alone is brought to life by our signature head for the cure 5k run/walk events. These events are the cornerstone of our community building and fundraising efforts. In 2024, more than 20,000 participants came together in 21 cities across the country. Every 5k serves as a beacon of hope and a platform for shared experiences, offering unity, remembrance, and support to the brain cancer community. While a core purpose remains raising funds for vital research, these events equally serve to foster deep community connections.beyond the 5k finish line, hftc provides a variety of specialized resources to support patients and caregivers throughout their journey. This year saw the significant expansion of path to hope (formerly known as brains for the cure) and the brain cancer support & solutions alliance (bcssa). As its first major initiative, the bcssa appointed a neuro-oncology nurse navigator who offers highly specialized assistance addressing both the psychological and practical needs of patients and caregivers. Furthermore, we advanced our technological reach with the launch of the "join your path to hope" (jph) online resource, hosted on path to hope. This accessible platform features a quick, intuitive questionnaire designed to provide newly diagnosed patients and caregivers with immediate, personalized resources. We also continued to cultivate emotional support through our monthly legacy of hope online support group, facilitated by hftc staff, which includes guest speakers and discussions on grief-related topics, helping participants find comfort and honor the legacies of their loved ones.we recognize that the brain cancer diagnosis journey is long. With the support of our dedicated community, we are committed to walking it together, step by step. Looking ahead, we plan to expand our geographical reach by launching in five new cities, enhancing our existing patient and caregiver resources, and creating new connections between community members through compelling content and continuous support initiatives.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 54% for direct work, and 46% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.7%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 70.1%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.2%; rating input score 99; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.7% of revenue deployed · 70.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $122K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 36 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 36 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.