Hccf Real Estate Supporting Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455325718
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Corydon, IN, USA
- Phone
- 8127386668
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,292,228
- Expenses
- $383,640
- Assets
- $7,931,515
- Liabilities
- $8,729,015
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIE MOORMAN (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JULIE MOORMAN (CEO): $188,680 total reported compensation
- DERRICK GRIGSBY (CFO): $169,284 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the harrison county community foundation is to inspire and assist everyone to experience philanthropy, producing positive and sustainable growth in harrison county. Hccf's vision is to grow harrison county into the best community to live, work and raise a family. Hccf values generosity, integrity, sustainability, stewardship, innovation, collaboration, inclusion, and excellence.
What it reported doing in 2025
The hccf real estate supporting organization, inc. (hccf reso) is a not-for-profit supporting organization of the harrison county community foundation (hccf). The hccf reso was established for the receipt of real estate donations or the location of real estate acquisitions benefitting harrison county, Indiana through hccf. The board of directors of the hccf reso is comprised of the current chair, vice chair, audit committee chair, and two additional hccf board members.the mission of the harrison county community foundation is to inspire and assist everyone to experience philanthropy, producing positive and sustainable growth in harrison county. Hccf's vision is to grow harrison county into the best community to live, work and raise a family. Hccf values generosity, integrity, sustainability, stewardship, innovation, collaboration, inclusion, and excellence.the harrison county community foundation values its role as a catalyst, convener, and collaborator, bringing other funders and nonprofits together around vital issues and adding key support to make positive change possible. Hccf's work is centered around meeting community needs. The hccf reso has three ongoing projects under its umbrella: the boys and girls club of harrison county is housed in an hccf reso-owned building. The arrangement made it possible for the boys and girls club to operate in a facility designed to meet their needs. Approximately 280 kids participate in safe, meaningful after-school and summer programs at this facility.hccf was awarded a $4.5 million implementation grant by lilly endowment inc.in the fall of 2024. With a $3 million commitment to this project by the hccf board of directors, hccf announced the construction of a new boys and girls club in the northern part of harrison county. The hccf reso purchased land just south of palmyra. Construction is set to begin later in 2025. In 2017, hccf partnered with harrison county government and mainstream fiber networks (mfn) to install "backbone" fiber optic cable throughout the county. The hccf reso owns 115 miles of backbone fiber optic cable that will enable over 80% of the residences and businesses through harrison count to plug into reliable high-speed internet. Work continues to provide high-speed internet access throughout the county. Although the initial project is complete, the project partners are aware that some areas of the county are still awaiting access. Mfn continues to install connections, update equipment, secure easements, and address geological issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 50
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.7%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 70.3%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.67; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.1; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 26.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 29.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $384K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $189K · 7 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.