Hattie Larlham Care Group
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364446861
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Mantua, OH, USA
- Phone
- 3302742272
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,822,269
- Expenses
- $4,754,339
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIKE WEINHARDT (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
- DAN GLESSNER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- STEPHEN COLECCHI (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- STEPHEN COLECCHI (CEO): $246,163 total reported compensation
- GREG SNYDER (CFO): $162,334 total reported compensation
- SANDRA CINCH (VP QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND): $120,236 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Because we believe life is sacred, hattie larlham enhances the quality of life for people with disabilities and their families through our commitment to comfort, joy, and achievement.
What it reported doing in 2018
Hattie larlham care group provides physical therapy, occupational therapy, and administrative services in a public school housed on hattie larlham center of children's campus through an agreement with the educational service center of cuyahoga county (esc). The therapy services are provided to the children who attend the school. The majority of the individuals attending the school reside in one of hattie larlham care group's supported organizations. Physical therapy focuses on developing mobility and control through various hands-on techniques of muscle relaxation, stretching, facilitating and/or inhibiting individual muscles or whole muscle groups. Occupational therapy strives to achieve as much independence as possible in both play and self-care. Programs focus on movements to facilitate mobility so an individual can play with a toy, participate in mealtimes, bathe and dress.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.4%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -62.7% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $246K · 11 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.