Hattie Larlham

Legal name: Hattie Larlham Center for Children with Disabilities

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
340963865
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Mantua, OH, USA
Phone
330-274-2272
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Developmentally Disabled Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$84,740,363
Expenses
$75,198,257
Assets
$70,263,211
Liabilities
$23,403,446

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATHLEEN SANNITI (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MIKE WEINHARDT (PRESIDENT)
  • STEPHEN COLECCHI (CEO, ASSISTANT SECRETARY)
  • SANDRA CINCH (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEPHEN COLECCHI (CEO, ASSISTANT SECRETARY): $402,224 total reported compensation
  • SHANNON RITCHIE (VP, BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT & CSO): $272,036 total reported compensation
  • JOHN KEVERKAMP (CFO): $266,403 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hattie Larlham is dedicated to providing comfort, joy, and fulfillment to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Central Ohio - provide in-home support to over 164 individuals with developmental disabilities in their own homes or in one of central Ohio's 13 licensed homes. Through these programs individuals are ensured to be healthy and happy in their homes and engaged in our community. The adventures day program provides daytime recreational and educational programs to approximately 70 adults with developmental disabilities. The dahlberg gibson learning center, an early intervention program, served 99 children from the ages of one to five. Children experienced increased engagement, improved communications, increased self-regulation and improved motor skills. Franklin county recreation serves approximately 150 individuals with evening and weekend activities. The discovery and transition to work programs served 98 individuals during the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.2%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.3%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 79.2% of revenue deployed · 89.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $67M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $402K · 20 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.