Hatcher at Scyene Title Holding Company
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471242650
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4692210704
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Real Estate Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $71,672
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Benjamin Glispie (President)
People named in this filing
- JMcDonald Williams (Secretary)
- John Castle Jr (-)
- Benjamin Glispie (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is a Qualified Active Low-Income Community Business (QALIC B) for New Markets Tax Credit purposes. It exists to construct and hold title, collect rent and pay expenses related to leasing out a facility used as a medical center in the Frazier area of Dallas, TX.
What it reported doing in 2022
The organization was formed in August 2014, and entered into a primary lease with Frazier Revitalization, Inc., which in turn entered into a sub-lease with Dallas County Hospital District, doing business as Parkland Health & Hospital System (Parkland Health) for 25 years. In August 2014, the Dallas Development Fund (DDF) awarded a $15,000,000 New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) allocation to Frazier Revitalization, Inc. for the construction of 44,378 square foot medical facility in the Frazier area of Dallas, Texas. The transaction closed in August 2014, with the DDF and JPMorgan Chase, N.A. (Chase). As the NMTC Equity investor, Chase provided approximately $4.89 million in NMTC Equity. Chase provided a $11.7mm term loan (Senior Loan) to Frazier Revitalization, Inc., part of which was used to fund a $10.45 million "Leverage Loan" from Frazier Revitalization to Chase Investment Fund (CIF), a special purpose investment fund entity. Chase is responsible for the management of CIF. The NMTC Equity and Leverage Loan was combined to capitalize the CIF, which in turn made a Qualified Equity Investment (QEI) of $15 million into a subsidiary of DDF (Sub-CDE). DDF, through the aforementioned Sub-CDE, made two Qualified Low Income Community Investment (QLICI) loans to the Organization. The is a Qualified Active Low Income Community Business (QALIC B). Construction of the facility was completed in April 2015 and opened in May 2015.In August 2021, in accordance with NMTC regulations, the compliance period for the investment made by the Sub-CDE to the organization ended. The NMTC transactions were terminated, and interests were realigned as follows: CIF transferred 100% of its member interest to Chase NMTC Hatcher Station Investment Fund, LLC, owned by Frazier Revitalization, Inc.; DDF assigned the QLICI loans to Chase MNTC Hatcher Station Investment Fund, LLC in consideration of its member interest in DDF; being the only owner, Frazier Revitalization, Inc. dissolved the Chase NMTC Hatcher Station Investment Fund, LLC.In accordance with a provision in the sub-lease between Parkland Health and Frazier Revitalization, the tenant, Parkland Health, exercised their right to purchase the facility after the end of the seven year NMTC tax compliance period. In October 2021, the organization sold the medical facility to Parkland Health for $22.8 million, terminated the sub-lease, and Frazier Revitalization, Inc. terminated the primary lease with the organization; The organization repaid QLICI loan A to the Frazier Revitalization, Inc.; Frazier Revitalization, Inc. forgave QLICI loan B, and repaid the Chase Senior Loan. The Transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $8.2 million.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -37.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $72K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.