Frazier Revitalization Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203395474
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4692210704
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Economic Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,345,073
- Expenses
- $2,654,751
- Assets
- $12,588,397
- Liabilities
- $1,160,969
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dorothy Hopkins (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Felisa Conner (VP of Operations): $124,616 total reported compensation
- Dorothy Hopkins (President & CEO): $25,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Economic, cultural development, and revitalization of the South Dallas Fair Park area.
What it reported doing in 2024
Frazier Revitalization (the Organization) continues to work within the framework and in accordance with the comprehensive revitalization plan adopted by the City of Dallas. The Organization continues to work toward a planned development at the corner of Elsie Faye Heggins (formerly Hatcher) and Scyene to be the catalyst transit-oriented development (TOD) as prescribed in the comprehensive revitalization plan of the City, Community and the TOD study (also adopted by the City of Dallas). A 44,378 square foot clinic was completed and leased to Parkland Health, opening in 2015 as a community oriented primary care clinic. The facility was sold to Parkland Health in 2021. Phase 2 of the development includes a 4,340 square foot clinic that was constructed by FRIHS GP, LLC a wholly owned subsidiary of the Organization, and once it was completed it was donated to Texas A&M University System in 2021, specifically the School of Dentistry, for their use as a dental clinic. The 8 chair state of the art clinic was completed in the fall of 2020, donated to Texas A&M University System in March 2021 and opened in April 2021.In 2021, Frazier Revitalization launched a home improvement program to address the deteriorating housing stock in the neighborhood. Since inception of the program through year end 2024, 48 homes have been addressed at a cost of just under $4MM demonstrating the effectiveness of our place-based revitalization model. In addition to securing and/or spurring wealth creation and addressing residents' priorities in homes, the program addresses other concerns such as their health, safety and livability in their community, and also offers wraparound services such as financial training, understanding the importance of, and having access to will preparation and estate planning, property tax consulting, home maintenance training, and computer skills classes. Frazier Healthy Homes, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Frazier Revitalization, Inc. contracts with the homeowners and construction contractors and sub-contractors to improve the homes.Frazier Revitalization functions as a quarterback organization bridging the neighborhood residents and institutional and city-wide organizations with a trauma informed approach. Since 2009 the Organization has offered afterschool and summer programming for approximately 50 students grades K-8, with a particular focus on program based learning and social and emotional health.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $30.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.74; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 16 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $1.2M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.