Hartford HealthCare Medical Group
Legal name: Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454456939
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2021
- Location
- Wethersfield, CT, USA
- Phone
- 877.707.4442
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $243,367,330
- Expenses
- $243,354,283
- Assets
- $138,802,624
- Liabilities
- $135,108,276
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Eric Sussman (Neurosurgeon): $2,219,469 total reported compensation
- Sabet Hashim MD (SVP, Physician-in Chef): $1,795,191 total reported compensation
- Jeff Cohen MD (Director/ Chair): $1,660,694 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We put patients at the center of everything we do, offering trusted outpatient care from hundreds of skilled doctors and advanced practitioners across Connecticut.
What it reported doing in 2024
Hartford HealthCare Medical Group (HHCMG) is a multi-specialty group encompassing providers located throughout the state of Connecticut. In addition to clinical practice, our doctors are teachers and researchers, always looking for ways to improve the quality of care and bring innovations to their patients.Hartford HealthCare Medical Group has more than 400 primary care providers located throughout the state of Connecticut. HHCMG offers Primary Care, Urgent Care and Walk-in services, Virtual visits and Occupational Medicine. We are a member of Hartford HealthCare and are affiliated with some of the region's top hospitals including Hartford Hospital, The Hospital of Central Connecticut, MidState Medical Center, Windham Hospital, Backus Hospital, Charlotte Hungerford Hospital and St. Vincent's Medical Center.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.6%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.97; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 84.6% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $206M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.2M · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $50.1M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 62 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.