Hartford HealthCare at Home Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 060646938
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2021
- Location
- Wethersfield, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8606963555
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Home Health Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $153,240,296
- Expenses
- $167,494,895
- Assets
- $115,624,494
- Liabilities
- $126,307,905
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Chibueze Agba (Director, President & Treasurer)
Highest reported compensation
- Chibueze Agba (Director, President & Treasurer): $2,052,960 total reported compensation
- Bimal Patel (Director & Secretary): $1,693,030 total reported compensation
- Rocco Orlando MD (Director & Secretary (Thru 12/2024)): $1,181,267 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the agency is to provide and safeguard quality home health care to all persons in need, especially the indigent and medically underserved population. The agency strongly believes that appropriate health care is a fundamental right and not a privilege.
What it reported doing in 2024
Home Health Care: Hartford HealthCare at Home, Inc. is one of Connecticut's largest nonprofit providers of comprehensive home health care, hospice, and private duty services. Founded in Hartford in 1901 and Waterbury in 1903, the agency has a history of community involvement spanning more than 100 years. Today, the agency serves more than 148 towns in Connecticut.Hartford HealthCare at Home, Inc. is committed to its founding mission of providing quality home care to all persons in need, especially the indigent and medically underserved population. The agency strongly believes that appropriate health care is a fundamental right, not a privilege. No one is turned away, and the agency uses contributions, grants, and other means to fill the gap when a client cannot pay. Agency staff visit clients in their own environments, from the inner city to the suburbs. In fulfillment of its mission, Hartford HealthCare at Home, Inc. staff often go into areas others do not serve. This requires additional staff to provide translation services to ensure patients understand their health needs. The agency also uses charitable funds to offset the difference between the cost of providing care to the indigent and the funds received from the State of Connecticut Medicaid program. On an annual basis, the amount exceeds $3 million. Hartford HealthCare at Home, Inc. boasts unparalleled loyalty to its clients and is strongly committed to helping those most in need continue receiving care. Charitable gifts are essential to sustaining this mission. Hartford HealthCare at Home, Inc. services include skilled nursing, physical, occupational, and speech therapy, medical social work, and home health aide support. The specialty nursing staff has expertise in wound care, diabetes, cardiac and respiratory issues, and provides strategies to enable clients to remain at home and achieve good outcomes. The agency also provides Meals on Wheels. Charitable funding has supported the development and ongoing financial needs of this innovative but non-reimbursable service. Hartford HealthCare at Home, Inc. is proud of the fact that it continues to achieve very high-quality outcomes at or above national and state levels despite serving a large population that lacks the means to fully participate in its care.Hartford HealthCare at Home, Inc. Independent Living Services provides services that allow clients to continue living safely and independently. These include assistance with daily personal care, such as bathing, dressing, grocery shopping, and meal preparation; a 24-hour emergency response system; and volunteer support. The agency also provides live-in care for clients who need around-the-clock service to remain at home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.5%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 80.4%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.09; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.5% of revenue deployed · 80.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $134.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.1M · 14 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $10.5M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 60 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.