Harper-hutzel Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
382391907
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
Detroit, MI, USA
Phone
3135782115
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$622,520,945
Expenses
$619,616,925
Assets
$183,017,875
Liabilities
$97,508,393

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

36 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Harper-hutzel aspires to be the premier health care resource in southeast Michigan and among the finest health care centers in the united states through excellence in the provision of clinical care enhanced by education and research. In all clinical endeavors, quality of care is paramount. In addition, we believe access to quality health care is the right of every human being. Harper-hutzel - along with local, state and federal government - supports a unique public mission to residents of the communities we serve to assure this right is preserved.

What it reported doing in 2010

Internal medicine (general)- the internal medicine service provided care for 17,081 patients in 2010. Internal medicine provides comprehensive inter-disciplinary service that focuses on coordination of testing (inpatient vs. Outpatient) and rapid discharge to minimize length of stay. Mri and colonoscopy screening processes have been implemented to support these efforts. Additionally, internal medicine is responsible for achieving high quality standards. The pneumonia initiative screens patients for immunization, and the ventilator associated pneumonia (vap) quality initiative focuses efforts in the icu to ensure patients are taken off the ventilator as soon as possible. In 2010, the hospital also continued the process to obtain stroke certification. 2010 awards award designations for harper in 2010 include: u.s. News & world report best hospital in america listing for neurology, neurosurgery, cardiology, gynecology, geriatrics and pulmonary. In existence for 22-years, the u.s. News & world report best hospital ranking's purpose is to help guide patients who need an unusually high level of hospital expertise to the top medical institutions in the country. Other designations for harper in 2010 were: leapfrog which is the gold standard in the country for comparing hospital's performance on the national standards of safety, quality and efficiency that are most relevant to consumers and purchaser of care. Hospitals that participate in the leapfrog hospital survey achieve hospital-wide improvements that translate into millions of lives and dollars saved. Harper has achieved leapfrog status each year since 2005. 2010 most wired hospital - for the fifth consecutive year, harper university hospital has been named to the nation's most wired list, according to the results of the 2010 most wired survey and benchmarking study released in the july issue of hospitals & health networks magazine which has named the 100 most wired hospitals and health systems since 1999. The most wired survey is conducted annually by hospitals & health networks magazine, which uses the results to name the 100 most wired hospitals and health systems. It focuses on how the nation's hospitals use information technologies for quality, customer service, public health and safety, business processes and workforce issues. In 2010, harper beat out johns hopkins as national leader in emr innovations. Healthcare informatics named harper as their top 2010 innovator award recipient. Harper beat out johns hopkins for the most important electronic healthcare innovation in america. Harper was chosen for its "neonatal barcode scanning" project. This national breakthrough will eventually prevent medication errors such as those that almost took the lives of actor dennis quaid's infant twins. Being selected as an "hci innovator awards top 10 finalist" means an organization has gone beyond traditional problem solving approaches, focusing instead on creative solutions that maximize limited time, staffing and money to bring about meaningful changes in patient care and overall efficiency.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 15 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $568.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $930K · 36 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Related organizations: 56 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.