Huron Valley Hospital Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
382155995
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
Commerce Township, MI, USA
Phone
2489373374
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hospital, General

Reported finances

Revenue
$178,334,085
Expenses
$176,383,431
Assets
$108,075,354
Liabilities
$8,653,410

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

34 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Huron valley hospital, inc. Is a member/subsidiary hospital of the detroit medical center (dmc) and has adopted the dmc mission as follows: the detroit medical center (dmc) aspires to be the premier health care resource in southeast Michigan and among the finest health care centers in the united states through excellence in the provision of clinical care enhanced by education and research. In all clinical endeavors, quality to care is paramount. In addition, the dmc believes that access to quality health care is the right of every human being. Dmc, along with local, state and federal governments, supports a unique public mission to the residents of the communities we serve to assure this right is preserved.

What it reported doing in 2010

The internal medicine program at huron valley hospital, inc. (hvh) treated 15,018 patients in 2010. This represents 4,230 inpatients and 10,788 outpatients. Hvh has an array of subspecialties which include cardiovascular sciences, critical care, gastroenterology, hematology, infectious diseases and medical onclolgy. Hvh is an accredited chest pain center with emergency angioplasty designation which allows cardiologists to open up arteries of the heart during a heart attack. This is an exciting addition to hvh's continuum of cardiovascular services which already include screening, prevention and diagnostic and rehabilitation services. As an accredited chest pain center, hvh offers rapid diagnosis and fast-track treatment before a cardiac situation worsens, often preventing a severe heart attack from occurring. The society of chest pain centers awarded hvh the three-year accreditation with a percutaneous cardiac intervention (pci) designation, the only hospital in the area to be awarded such designation. Pci is the technical name for angioplasty, the process of clearing a blocked or narrowed coronary artery that could lead to a heart attack. The accreditation follows the society's rigorous review of the hospital's clinical protocols and the patient care it provides chest pain patients. Diagnostics: top-quality cardiac care includes state-of-the-art diagnostic testing that reveals a comprehensive view of the heart. Our specialists provide the latest in cardiac testing procedures: - stress testing - cardiopulmonary stress testing - pharmaceutical stress testing - cardiac catheterization - treadmill testing - tilt table study - echocardiogram - dobutamine echocardiogram - stress echocardiogram - transesophageal echocardiogram - holter monitoring - 30-day event monitoring - diagnosis and treatment options for peripheral arterial disease (pad) - priority access to a 128-slice ct cardiac imaging hvh has also added ldl aphoresis which is similar to kidney dialysis. Blood is continually removed from a patient's vein and run through a machine that separates out the plasma. While the rest of the blood is passed back to the patient through a different vein, the plasma is run through another part of the machine that removes the ldl in the plasma. Thus, the blood is cleared of the bad cholesterol. Hvh offers a series of free educational programs designed to explain complex medical issues in layman's terms. People's medical college programs are unique opportunities to meet physicians and other clinicians and learn about the latest advancements in care available.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 95.5%; rating input score 95; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 21 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $162.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $378K · 34 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Related organizations: 56 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.