Guy Harvey Ocean Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261710999
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8002881227
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,613,565
- Expenses
- $2,585,809
- Assets
- $2,498,166
- Liabilities
- $1,285,851
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSICA HARVEY (CEO, SECRETARY)
Highest reported compensation
- JESSICA HARVEY (CEO, SECRETARY): $115,331 total reported compensation
- DAVID LOPEZ (CFO (AS OF 2/1/24)): $43,013 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The guy harvey foundation (ghf) collaborates with local and international organizations to conduct scientific research and host educational programs aimed at better understanding and conserving the ocean environment. (continued on schedule o) the ghf also funds inspired scientific research and innovative educational programs developed by universities, colleges, institutes, and nonprofit organizations that promise to bring new ideas and initiatives to marine conservation and that encourage conservations and best management practice for sustainable marine environment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Science and research: the guy harvey foundation (ghf) research programs are dedicated to expanding the scientific knowledge necessary for effective conservation of fish populations and maintenance of fish biodiversity. The high-quality scientific information provided by ghf is critical to the universally recognized urgent need to develop and implement effective measures for the conservation and enhancement of fish resources worldwide. Research programs include: (1) satellite tagging shortfin mako sharks, (2) satellite and conventional tagging dolphinfish in the nw atlantic ocean, caribbean sea, and eastern tropical pacific, (3) tagging and tracking billfish in the eastern tropical pacific ocean, and (4) satellite tagging of whale sharks off the yucatan peninsula. (continued on schedule o)1. Satellite tagging shortfin mako sharks in the nw atlantic ocean and western caribbean / gulf of mexico. The guy harvey foundation and guy harvey research institute (ghri) at nova southeastern university deployed five satellite tracking tags (spot tags) on shortfin mako sharks in the nw atlantic ocean and western caribbean / gulf of mexico as part of a multiyear study to understand the migration patterns and fishing mortality for this species. This research project provided the first fisheries-independent fishing mortality rate for this economically and ecologically important species, which was 10 times higher than previously thought. This discovery led the international organization that manages mako sharks to downgrade their status to overfished with overfishing occurring. This change of status, in turn, prompted the u.s. Government (noaa) to increase protections for mako sharks in federal waters, including mandating the release of live mako sharks in the commercial fishery and an increased minimum size in the recreational fishery.2. Satellite and conventional tagging dolphinfish in the nw atlantic ocean, caribbean sea, and eastern tropical pacific. The foundation partnered with the dolphinfish research program to deploy pop-up satellite tracking tags (psat tags) and geolocating tags on atlantic and pacific dolphinfish and to engage recreational anglers in a tag and recapture citizen science study. This highly reproductive fish has long been thought to be immune to overfishing but anecdotal evidence is showing a decline in the numbers and size of dolphinfish around the world and specifically in the southeast united states. The satellite tagging study is helping researchers better understand the season migrations of these fish while the tag and recapture study is providing invaluable data about the incredibly fast growth rate of these fish and how often they are caught. These data are fundamental to conserving this commercially and recreationally important species.3. Tagging and tracking billfish in the eastern tropical pacific ocean. The foundation partnered with nova southeastern university and tropic star lodge in panama on a comprehensive study of the billfish and other large vertebrates that inhabit the eastern tropical pacific ocean. This is the fourth year of a five-year study to deploy satellite pop-up tags and accelerometer tags on blue marlin, black marlin, and sailfish to better understand their migration patterns and how these species recover from the catch and release process. There is a significant amount of commercial fishing in this region, so fisheries managers need to know where these billfish are travelling. Additionally, the recreational fishery is very valuable to the region, so it is important to understand the effects that the catch and release process has on these animals. Data collected from the deployment of baited remote underwater video (bruv) cameras is in the process of being scientifically published.4. Satellite tagging of whale sharks off the yucatan peninsula. The foundation partnered with ch'ooj ajauil and the guy harvey research institute to deploy smart position and temperature (spot) transmitting tags on
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 46.2%; rating input score 46
- Program expense ratio: 63.7%; rating input score 64
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 90.6%; rating input score 91; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.4%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 46.2% of revenue deployed · 63.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 17 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $570K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.