WVU Medicine Grant Memorial Hospital
Legal name: Grant Memorial Hospital Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881740605
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Petersburg, WV, US
- Phone
- 304-257-1026
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $63,781,221
- Expenses
- $63,356,140
- Assets
- $32,713,162
- Liabilities
- $20,532,915
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Carrie Willetts (President Uniontown, Ex Officio Director)
- John Sylvia (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Carrie Willetts (President Uniontown, Ex Officio Director): $810,855 total reported compensation
- Scott Roberts (Physician): $659,271 total reported compensation
- Theresa Rutledge (Physician): $455,707 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health and well-being of the communities we serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Grant Memorial Hospital surgical team provides same-day, inpatient, and outpatient surgical procedures. Surgical cases are scheduled Monday through Friday, and surgical care is available for emergency situations 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The Surgical Department is staffed with highly trained registered nurses, surgical technicians, and certified registered nurse anesthetists. Grant Memorial Hospital has three large operating room suites, along with an endoscopy suite. Grant Memorial Hospital had 1,443 surgery cases in 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.5%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 82.3%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.63; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 75.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 75.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 80.5% of revenue deployed · 82.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $52.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $811K · 16 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.5M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 40 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.