Camden Clark Medical Center
Legal name: Camden-Clark Physician Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264058719
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Parkersburg, WV, US
- Phone
- (304) 424-2111
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,558,624
- Expenses
- $107,558,626
- Assets
- $19,986,621
- Liabilities
- $17,370,239
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Steve Altmiller (Ex Offico Director/CCMC President CEO, January - August)
Highest reported compensation
- Muhamed Barakat (Physician): $1,121,861 total reported compensation
- Yasu Harasaki MD (Physician): $1,093,628 total reported compensation
- Bairava Kuppuswamy MD (Director - Vice Chairman): $1,015,739 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The general purposes of the corporation are as follows to establish, support, manage, and furnish facilities, personnel, and services to provide diagnostic, therapeautic, wellness, health promotion, surgical, and other professional medical services to sick, injured, or disabled persons
What it reported doing in 2024
Camden Clark Physician Corporation offers 8 Primary Care clinics across Parkersburg, WV and into Belpre, OH. These clinics work with the general public to provide patient well being. In 2024, Primary Care reported 209,862 work relative value units wRVUs and had a total of 102,634 visits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 56
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 97%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.87; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 97% of revenue deployed · 97% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $104.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $16.9M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 40 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.