Goodwill Works of Lane County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593763660
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Eugene, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5413451801
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $76
- Assets
- $2,766
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VIRGINIA SLATE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VIRGINIA SLATE (PRESIDENT)
- KATHLEEN HYNES (SECRETARY)
- DON HESCHELES (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Goodwill works was established to assist goodwill industries of lane and south coast counties to provide vocational rehabilitation services, training, employment, and opportunities for personal growth as an interim step in the vocational rehabilitation process for people with disabilities who cannot work in the competitive labor market or where no such labor opportunities presently exist.
What it reported doing in 2016
Goodwill works was established in 2003 for the purpose of assisting goodwill industries of lane and south coast counties to provide vocational rehabilitation services, training, employment, and opportunities for personal growth as an interim step in the vocational rehabilitation process for people with disabilities and the disadvantaged who cannot be readily absorbed into the competitive labor market or during such time as employment opportunities for them in the competitive labor market do not exist.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 36.39; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.