Goodwill Industries of Lane and South Coast Counties
Legal name: Goodwill Industries of Lane and South Coast Counties Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930572370
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Eugene, OR, US
- Phone
- 541-345-1801
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $50,042,331
- Expenses
- $46,600,352
- Assets
- $92,189,959
- Liabilities
- $42,026,929
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES MARTIN (PRESIDENT &)
Highest reported compensation
- JAMES MARTIN (PRESIDENT &): $632,037 total reported compensation
- KRISTY LANGWORTHY (CFO): $347,508 total reported compensation
- JOY MEDLEY (VP OF RETAIL): $295,841 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide vocational opportunities to individuals with barriers to employment. Goodwill Industries of Lane and South Coast Counties has served Oregon residents since 1954. We are a mission integrated, enterprise‐funded non‐profit 501(c)(3) organization. We currently operate 11 retail stores, 7 donation centers, and 8 job connection centers which provide a multitude of employment and training opportunities. Your donations change lives by funding the services we provide. CARF ACCREDITATION Goodwill Industries of Lane and South Coast Counties programs are accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF). CARF is an independent, not-for-profit agency promoting quality, value and optimal outcomes of services through a consultative process th.
What it reported doing in 2024
Work experience - provides recipients of public assistance with work experience. This program prepares them for entry into the competitive labor market. Services include job coaching, mentoring, and building of skills necessary for private employment. Job placement services - assists individuals with disabilities and other barriers to employment to identify vocational interest, research job opportunities, and obtain competitive employment. Homeless veterans reintegration program (hvrp) - offers job and career assistance for veterans who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. Veteran specialists offer participant-targeted assistance in resume preparation, overcoming gaps in employment history, educational assistance and/or training, interview preparation, interview and/or work clothing options, and placement assistance in job or career areas of their interest and/or expertise. Hvrp assists veterans using a broad list of other networks in the lane county community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 92.4%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $1,742.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 90.3%; rating input score 90; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.9%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.98; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 92.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $43.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $632K · 15 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.