Goodwill Temporary Services of Kentucky Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611316311
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Louisville, KY, USA
Phone
5022721700
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rural Economic Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,681,988
Expenses
$3,007,248
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMY LUTTRELL (PRESIDENT AS OF 6/13/2014)
  • DR MARSHA BERRY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ERIN GOLD (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ROLAND BLAHNIK (PRESIDENT EMERITUS)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROLAND BLAHNIK (PRESIDENT EMERITUS): $481,443 total reported compensation
  • ERIN GOLD (VICE PRESIDENT): $248,699 total reported compensation
  • DR MARSHA BERRY (VICE PRESIDENT): $222,713 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Goodwill temporary services helps people with disabilities or other disadvantages achieve and maintain employment to gain a better quality of life.

What it reported doing in 2014

Goodwill temporary services of Kentucky, inc., a not-for-profit subsidiary of goodwill industries of Kentucky, inc., operates in two full-service staffing locations in Kentucky, helping people with disabilities or other disadvantages find temporary jobs with the ultimate goal of full-time employment. Goodwill temporary services provides these job services for recent immigrants, ex-offenders, and people who are homeless, under-educated, disabled, or disadvantaged. Employment at goodwill temporary services enables these individuals to earn wages, gain work experience, and experience various employment opportunities. Goodwill temporary services provided 1,612 services and 1,410 placements during the 2015 fiscal year. 348 of these placements were at goodwill industries works locations, goodwill industries of Kentucky, and affiliate companies. In addition, goodwill temporary services helped move 117 individuals from temporary employment to hired positions while paying $2,051,819 in mission-related wages. These achievements were accomplished in part thanks to support services provided by goodwill industries of Kentucky, inc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 35
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 12.5%; rating input score 12; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.1%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.2%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -60.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -40.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -72.9% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $481K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2012 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.